She did say no, you tone it down, Pres. Bush (those words may not be in exact order but I believe they're all there) on her morning show. Usually I agree with her, but this comes across as strident and more importantly without merit. What non-conservative judge has he nominated thus far? None that I can think of. Can anyone else think of one? Pryor is the only judge I wasn't happy with, but it's not because he's a non-conservative.
Laura is such an intelligent woman that it's a shame to see her resort to ignoring what Pres. Bush has been attempting in his judiciary duty since he's been in office.
I'll put forward Gonzales as apparently the only social non-conservative so far. I admit I've only heard this and don't know the particulars, but the vast majority of the President's judicial nominees that I can recall are strict constructionists.
"What non-conservative judge has he nominated thus far?"
Well, gee, are you urging that we wait and see who he appoints to the Supreme Court before we start making noise about this? What if he did nominate Gonzales, which evidence suggests might well happen? Wouldn't it them be too late for us to make our views known?
In politics, "wait-and-see" can kill you. Conservatives have lost many battles by "waiting and seeing."