Posted on 07/05/2005 9:37:54 PM PDT by Brian_Baldwin
Tone what down, Mr. Bush? Who are you talking to?
To conservatives?
I think he is.
And I think Laura Ingraham, thinks he is, too.
And, proud of God Knows What, he slighted the conservatives who are suppose to sit around and watch their hair turn white as year after year after year after year betrayal, and now having given so much to put the Republicans and the Bush family BACK in power, who believed the oath Bush gave to church leaders, to conservative leaders, in back door meetings, when lots of money exchanged hands, and money from common people hard earned, and who told the common people all over this nation that he will fight to put a conservative on the bench, and now this from Mr. Peepers he tells us to “tone it down”? Laura Ingraham told Bush tonight, no YOU Bush, you tone it down. Don’t hush us. You hush. You listen. The House, The Senate, The White House, years and years in the making, and now it’s all yours, conservatives who ground down for you, and when it is time, you tell us to tone it down? Squander another 20 years?
Oh, I see. Really. Well, maybe you tone it down Mr. President, or perhaps as some are now calling you Mr. Peepers. Or should I be more respectful?
You tone it down when you talk to conservatives about this vital issue, this nomination to the Court. You better listen. If you told us a lie, you are going to really see who can make hell regarding “Bush Lied”, and it won’t be coming from the Left who are going to make you eat your own words.
You come to the conservatives, to the heroes, to the Patriots, willingly this time. That is more than just good advice, it's real good advice. Respect your family? You respect our families, and everything they have done for you. Your friends? Your loyalties? Who has been your friend, and gave you loyalty? You now need to respect our families, our loyalties. But if you will not approach my friends, my conservatives, with affection, of your own free will, you can take your family and your loyalty to your friends (in power) and you can sit and ride a dead horse right to where you are going, Mr. President.
Don’t you tell me about how the illegal aliens “do the work”, the work that Americans “won’t do”. Don’t you tell me what I would do or not do to support my family. How dare you. And you don’t tell us to tone it down. How dare you, again. Not this time.
Ugly words? You haven’t even heard it yet.
So in your opinion, the problem has not escalated in the past 25 years or so?
Laura Ingraham is a 4th rate Ann Coulter and neither of them are a patch on Mark Levin.
Laura is a verbal bomb-thrower and if even some of what is contained in the lead for this thread is what she actually said, nowhere near as bright as you and she think she is.
And you guys wonder why you are "race-baited" on FR. Hells bells don't be so obvious.
Bump Latra is great I listen to every morning love her show and she is one good conservative. You go girl!
No.
Read the thread again. The only words Brian_Baldwin attributed to Laura were "no, you tone it down". But he is right about the MASSIVE backlash that will befall President Bush were he to nominate Gonzales.
There is one guarantee, no matter who he nominates there will be a faction of "true conservatives" that will be unhappy.
As a fellow Texan, I'm sure you are backing Bush through thick and thin. That's an admirable trait, one that Bush values highly, loyalty. I guess in any group, including conservatives, there will always be those for whom no one is pure enough. But I believe the vast majority of "true" conservatives will be very happy if Bush chooses the likes of a Luttig, or Ted Olson, or McConnell, or Alito, etc., just as long as they don't have a track record that exposes moderate to liberal propensities. I doubt that Bush will do otherwise, but you never know. The problem with Gonzales was that he voted to uphold a partial birth abortion decision that he could have voted against, and that he was involved in the Affirmative Action case in Michigan (at the University) in a manner that could be construed as a moderate to liberal approach to AA. As I said earlier, I'm in wait and see mode. We'll soon know.
I'm perfectly willing to wait and see who gets nominated to the Court before I complain. But if President Bush can't do better than Alfredo Gonzales, I will join Laura - or whoever it was who wrote this.
Thanks! :-)
Yeah he may not get re-elected. If you tough guys get his back up he will rub your noses in it.
The race-baiters are members of La Raza, which means "the Race". They do no real good for latinos, and their efforts make America more vulnerable because of open borders.
Oh hell at least be intellectually honest. Just read FR threads. You would think this guy was Ted Kennedy. Not personal? Give me a break.
You may want to back off a bit.
So much so, that there was a movie made, in 1949, about a bunch of Americans, who lived on our Southerner border, who were having problems with them and form a vigilante group. It was on TCM last week or the one before. No, I didn't watch it, but I read the writeup on it.
No.
OK. Thanks for that assessment.
The President obviously isn't going to run for any office again. But he will be the last candidate with the last name Bush to be elected to anything were he to betray the conservative base of the GOP by nominating someone who supports abortion on demand, gay marriage, banned religious expression, gun control, etc. etc. I don't think he will do that, because he has shown himself to be true to his word.
And there is NO RECORD OF GONZOLEAS ADVOCATING ANY OF THOSE ITEMS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.