Posted on 06/20/2005 8:40:58 PM PDT by FairOpinion
Terri Schiavo's husband buried her cremated remains in a Clearwater cemetery Monday, inscribing on her bronze grave marker that ``I kept my promise.''
David Gibbs, an attorney for the woman's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, said inscribing the marker that way was a nasty political statement by Michael Schiavo, who held the service and burial Monday before telling her family.
``Obviously, that's a real shot and another unkind act toward a grieving mom and dad,'' Gibbs said.
After earlier announcing plans to bury his wife's ashes in their native Pennsylvania, Michael Schiavo instead interred them at Sylvan Abbey Memorial Park in Clearwater, near Tampa, his attorney, George Felos, said in a short news release Monday.
(Excerpt) Read more at sun-sentinel.com ...
And you think I did that all by myself? You actually think I do that on purpose?
That sounds like projection to me. The rest of us don't sitting around thinking stuff like that.
Frankly, I like you and your sanctimonious holier-than-thou posts out in the open for all the world to see.
She IS a lowlife. I've dealt with her before.
Peach - that last statement was pejorative and you know it. I dont disagree that this sort of this needs to be addressed, but there was PLENTY of evidence presented from NUMEROUS witnesses and medical experts that Terri was functioning at reasonable levels. SHE WAS NOT BRAIN DEAD. SHE WAS NOT A "VEGETABLE". You seem to be willing to omit that particular information from your statements and cling to the notion that she was an 'immoveable.' And I contend that she was very much a functioning human being whose family was perfectly willing to work with her. Did you miss all that was said about how at the beginning of her incapacitation, there was high promise of therapy giving her some of her independence and life functions back? I guess not, because you are too willing to throw statements like the last one you just made to me as a way to deflect the argument. Its not about whether or not she can be classified a 'vegetable.' Its about NOT STARVING A PERSON TO DEATH. Bottom line, Peach : YOU DO NOT STARVE A PERSON TO DEATH.
If that happened, I have to take some blame for that too.
Actually, as I said up the thread, it was accomplished by you and your friends.
Jackie Rhodes
So I called her Saturday afternoon and asked her, well, are we a blond or brunette? She said Im still a blond. But she was very, very upset when I was talking to her. It sounded like she had been crying. I asked her if she was okay. She said she had a fight with Michael. That he was extremely upset with her because she had spent, I think she told me $80, on her hair that day to stay blond.
So I asked her if she wanted me to come over. She didnt seem like her normal, jovial self. She said thats okay. Im going over to Bobbys. I said are you sure. She was very upset. She said Im going to Bobbys. I already talked to him and am going to go over as soon as we get off the phone.
You didn't read the autopsy, did you? That's about as brain dead as it gets, but still breathing on your own.
Uh, no. That was accomplished by someone who started attacking another freeper's family. But great projection on your part.
This was also reported by all the media outlets:
The autopsy results supported court findings during a long legal battle between Schiavo's parents and her husband that she was in a persistent vegetative state, meaning she could not think or feel, pathologists who conducted the autopsy said last week.
Yet this comes directly from the autopsy report:
Excerpts from Terri Schiavo Autopsy ReportDr. Stephen Nelson, Neuropathologist, in a report contained within the autopsy report: "The persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state are clinical diagnoses, not pathologic ones. ..."
"Neurophysiologic examination alone of the decedent's brain - or any brain for that matter - cannot prove or disprove a diagnosis of persistent vegetative state or minimally conscious state".
I guess I don't consider the media outlets to be very credible after seeing that.
I, the male you ain't, have more decency in my left pinky than those who have demeaned the Schlinders for the sake of ignoring and making palpabe a murder.
Wow. Why don't you post the entire thing from Jackie RHodes which shows what a liar she is?
Much has been made of Jackie Rhodes' testimony that she was "worried" about Terri the night before, yet it is nowhere in the transcript. Jackie did say, at trial, that Terri had talked about getting a divorce and the, getting an apartment together. But this was very different from what she said earlier - where she said Michael and Terri were trying to have a baby. Here is part of Felos' cross-exam of Jackie Rhodes' 2000 testimony, wherein he quotes much of her testimony from her deposition the week before as her story had been so embellished at trial (as noted by Greer):
Felos: What I dont understand is this. I took your deposition --
Jackie: On January 12th.
Felos: Yeah. I guess your recollection is very good. A couple of weeks ago.
I was very specific in asking you what things you talked to Terri about and
what you two confided about.
Ill read from your deposition rather extensively. Its important here.
On Page 15, Line 1,
you mentioend that you would each share things that were going on in your life.
You mentioned one of the things that Terri shard was that she was bored in
the evening because her husband worked evenings.
Answer: Um-hmm.
Question: Any other things that you can recall that
Terri shared with you about her life? Things that
were happening in her life?
Answer: they were talking about having, she was
going to the same gynecologist that I was and she did
-- she had not gotten pregnant and I guess they were
going to try to have a child.
You talk on page 6 about the gynecology. The pregnancy. The children.
Then I go on right after that
on Page 16, Line 21:
Question: Are there any other subjects that you can
recall Terri talked to you about besides the one you
mentioned?
Answer: There would be times that Michael
would call her at work and you know be upset and want
to quit his job and she would become upset. So I would
talk to her about that, as my husband would do the same
thing to me. So we could relate.
Campbell: Objection to this line of questioning. So far the testimony he is reading is the same testimony she gave this morning.
Court: With one exception. My notes say Michael called constantly. What he just read, the quote I wrote down is at times.
Felos: Its the next question, Your Honor. After the one about conversations about the job.
Question: Anything else you can
think of as far as things that Terri, things happening
in Terris life that she discussed with you?
Answer: I really cant remember. Its been so long.
Can you tell me why two weeks ago I asked you specifically to tell me the
things that Terri told you about in her life and you told me about Mike
calling up, being upset about his job. You told me about the gynecologist.
You told me she was upset about his working evenings, and that was it.
You could not recall anything else.
Now, two weeks later, you come in here and have a long time to think Michael
has done this and that. Terri told me about a divorce. We were going to
live together. Have an apartment. How is it you recall all these things,
but you did not tell me that two weeks ago?
You mean you're male? LOL
Actually, it's something that you all SAY to convince yourself there's some kind of conspiracy against you all.
We all have ping lists for certain topics; I have at least ten different ones myself, not including the Live Thread ping list; people discuss different topics with different people.
If you're seeing people being pinged to a thread, that's what it is. (Unless, of course, you subscribe to the "they're all here to get us" theory of some posters).
And I sure as hell don't need any help debating the likes of yellowdog; she's like a high school girl who didn't get picked for cheerleader and never got over it.
Also, the empty mind comment is reflective of your contempt.
Contempt? Well, you've got that right. She stirs the pot and talks about people behind their backs. If that's who you choose for your friends, so be it.
BTW, I looked and I don't see ANY place on this thread where anybody got "pinged" for help. How about pointing those out for me.
There has been reported, (articles posted on FR), that there is a high rate of misdagnosis.
Kate Adamson. This is a partial transcript from The O'Reilly Factor, November 5, 2003.
I did read it...and find it totally lacking in information that came to light BEFORE her death. That and the fact that MS hastily had the body burned as soon as the body was released for burial, thus erasing any further investigation. But that little detail doesnt seem to bother the apologist much either.
You know, that's just something you say to justify the fact that hardly anybody agrees with you, EV.
And as I said up the thread, I surely don't need any HELP with the likes of you or your holier-than-thou pals.
You need to let that go.
You are amazing.
You said:There's not a shred of proof that caring people told Terri to stay away from MS that night.
Jackie Rhodes did.
The gravestone doesn't even mention Terri's parents and siblings.
A normal man would have written "Beloved Wife, Daughter, Sister."
He is scum.
It is truly pathetic to see someone who thinks they are making a point by stooping to low-life attacks on someone's family. It is more pathetic to see someone who doesn't have the guts to admit they were wrong in doing so. You have no honor. You have no decency. And you are a coward.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.