Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Physicist; dread78645; Tax-chick

Something to add to the discussion.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/04/050418204410.htm

(sorry I am so late getting to the thread) sigh.


292 posted on 05/22/2005 9:07:19 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]


To: RadioAstronomer
It's not often that I read something in English (or even Spanish) that I find totally unintelligible.

... whose light has been stretched out or redshifted to nearly double its original wavelength by the expansion of the universe ...

I'm picturing sort of filmy rubber bands here ...

293 posted on 05/22/2005 9:27:09 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I'm a shallow, demagoguic sectarian because it's easier than working for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

To: RadioAstronomer; Proud_texan; Physicist
Thanks, RA

If I'm reading that right, Webb and Davies measured the dark line ("missing") wavelengths that were absorbed between there and here instead of the bright line emissions from the source.

If so, that's a pretty questionable methodology.

296 posted on 05/22/2005 11:51:59 AM PDT by dread78645 (Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson