[sdpatriot]

>>I've had it with the lunatics who think a gun runner should have any rights anywhere.<<

this case just happened to be about guns. it could just as easily been about something that doesn't scare you so bad... you seem to be willing to throw American soveriegnty out the window just because of the defendent's charge in this instance. think about it - do you really want American citizens to be at the mercy of foreign courts to this extent? i don't.

[harrowup]

Let's see, you want to allow a gun runner to be able to use his US citizenship to get a visa to visit Japan and smuggle in weapons and ammunition and then after he is released let him come back and be allowed to have his gun running business restored?

Is that correct?

Then you want to lock up all the furrerners who come to this country looking for work to be thrown into jail or shot?

Is that correct?

But, you don't want some foreign law messing with your gun runner?

Tell you what, toots. Go to Canada. Take a gun. See you in ten. Please.

[Texas Federalist]

this case just happened to be about guns. it could just as easily been about something that doesn't scare you so bad... you seem to be willing to throw American soveriegnty out the window just because of the defendent's charge in this instance.

The crew you are talking to would rather take an immediate position on every issue, whether they thought it out or not, and defend it with all their venom. I call it "Ol' Granpa Syndrome". It's fun. Just shout out random positions on various topics, then if someone exposes your position as nonsensical, personally attack them.