Is that correct?
Then you want to lock up all the furrerners who come to this country looking for work to be thrown into jail or shot?
Is that correct?
But, you don't want some foreign law messing with your gun runner?
Tell you what, toots. Go to Canada. Take a gun. See you in ten. Please.
>>Let's see, you want to allow a gun runner to be able to use his US citizenship to get a visa to visit Japan and smuggle in weapons and ammunition and then after he is released let him come back and be allowed to have his gun running business restored?<<<
you don't GET the case. not my problem. as Texas Federalist pointed out - he could still be charged under OUR laws/courts if there is some bases for it. and though i agree with you that there is much to be desired in our courts these days - i would much rather have them deciding if an American citizens rights need to be romoved rather than a foriegn court deciding that. stripping a citizen of their right to keep and bear arms is a U.S. Federal Decision - not Japans. that was specifically why i posted parts of the Decl of Independence - to show you this very thing was something the war against King George was faught over. that should matter to you.
ps... how do you know he is now "running guns" btw? what's your basis for that assumption? because he had a pistol and ammo? lol
>>>Is that correct?<<<
i want a U.S. court to decide if and when and why an American citizens rights should be removed. if they find that in the case of Mr. Small.... good for them, and bad for him, and ok by me.
>>Then you want to lock up all the furrerners who come to this country looking for work to be thrown into jail or shot?
Is that correct?<<<
(rolling eyes) you've totally lost it harrowup. i mean LOST IT. the answer to your INANE question is - no.
>>But, you don't want some foreign law messing with your gun runner?<<
my gun runner? i've never even defended this guy's actions when he was in Japan. He broke Japenese Law.. he paid for it when in Japan. (does Japen have the right to remove an American citizens unalienable rights when that citizen is back on U.S. soil -NO)
to answer your question - i don't want American citizens rights and their removal, while they reside in the U.S., to be at the whim of foreign courts -NO. certain American citizen's rights are unailanable, protected by our gvt. thus the only one who can remove those rights is an American court through due process.
>>Tell you what, toots. Go to Canada. Take a gun. See you in ten. Please.<<
(rolling eyes again) Toots.
you need to get a grip harrowup.
Is that correct?
Let's see, you want to allow a gun runner bible smuggler to be able to use his US citizenship to get a visa to visit Japan Saudi Arabia and smuggle in weapons and ammunition bibles and then after he is released let him come back and be allowed to have his gun running bible smuggling business restored?