Posted on 04/09/2005 7:03:51 AM PDT by harrowup
A Houstonian armed to the teeth stands atop his pickup truck in the Arizona desert. He wishes to deter illegal immigrants from Mexico, but he and his confederates will fail. Border Patrol officials said some civilian observers set off motion detectors, complicating rather than aiding the agency's mission.
(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...
Like most of your assertions.
For the record, I voted for President Bush. MOstly because of Iraq, the rest because Kerry could not be allowed to win the White House.
This in no way excuses the Presidents derliction of duty in enforcing our border and our immigration laws.
"A Houstonian armed to the teeth stands atop his pickup truck in the Arizona desert"
He had a grenade in his mouth??
If you've been a member for 40 years, you must like something about them. What part of the Communist agenda do you like? We already know you like disregarding a Nations laws. That much is plain from your defense of the criminal invasion of our border.
So what other tenets of Marx's theories do you like? The redistribution of wealth? Abolishment of private property? Destruction of religion? Are you a Stalinist with a personal problem against Polist Jews? Or are you more of a Trotsky-ite?
He'll be fine as long as he doesn't go shooting his mouth off.
R O T F L M A O
If he does, I hope there is an ACLU "voyeur" within spitting distance.
The two "friends" you mention may not be ACLU democrats, but they sure as hell aren't conservatives. At "best", maybe GOP "Big Tent" RINOs/liberals/moderates. At best. At worst, well, who knows. In any event, their credibility rating is like yours: zero.
Unreal. So a Traitor in your mind is someone that is critical of George Bush? Yet, a ACLU Open Borders left wing Democrat that is tenuously supportive of the president is "principled". Thanks for clearing the air on that.
I better understand now where you were coming from when you wrote this:
"You couldn't beat the Mexicans lead by brother Santa Anna at the Alamo - You're certainly not going to beat Mara Salvatrucha (M13) with a bunch of fat old ex-supply sergeants."
Beats the hell out of me. I can't imagine why FR would let this admitted ACLU democrat remain here in the face of banning some loyal conservatives.
Anyone who disparages American sovereignty and the importance of protecting our borders and preserving American culture, language and customs cannot, by definition, be a conservative. Most of them are clearly here to disrupt. They should be tossed out on their arses.
Please refrain from referring to this admitted ACLU democrat as a Republican.
Even the GOP Big Tent, as ridiculous as it is, isn't "big" enough to accommodate an ACLU democrat.
You remind me of me when I first went on a 'liberal' board.
I was the only liberal there. Everyone else was a welfare queen.
I learned quickly that a political label is considerably different from a pregnancy test. There is a lot or wiggle room long after the sperm has died.
Think of yourself that way for a day or two and then if you haven't laughed at yourself at least once you are hopeless.
It is not necessary to demonize those with whom you disagree. Joke if you wish and tease if you can, but just as in any bar or social hall, some of the names we call one another lack humor and jest.
As a matter of fact most of the words written on political boards are 92% false bravado and the rest bovine execrement...and would, if said directly to the intended target, result in a whack or two up the side the head.
I can forgive that in the younger crowd that grew up with PlayStation things and the Mario Brothers but for those of us who actually grew up playing outdoors as roughly as we could stand and who actually have shot living things it passes all understanding to behave so boorishly.
There is no more difference between one human's aspirations and another's than spit and polish.
Given a choice, who would you rather have on your side? A tenuously supportive person, or one who slanders you endlessly? I, and I am sure the President, would chose the former.
Now, lets make sure we understand you here. You are defending and taking the side of an admitted ACLU democrat, and attacking a loyal America-first patriot like Spiff who has spent time on the border with the Minutemen. Right?
So now, like harrowup, you have moved from little credibility on these threads to zero credibility.
You're no conservative. What are you?
If you believe even a tenth of what you have said about Clinton be gone, Ben Ficklin, Dane or anyone else who disagrees with you then you both need a couch or a pill or both.
One thing is certain, you cannot be taken seriously..
Do you really think that an admitted ACLU Democrat Communist sworn to "beating up" on conservatives and Republicans who's a "jihad" against the Minuteman Project is going to be taken at all seriously on a conservative Republican website populated primarily (check the polls) with people outraged about our lack of border security!?
All I've said about CBG, Ficklin, and Dane is that I've pointed out their lies, mistruths, and dishonesty and shown that they are the unwitting dupes and tools of an admitted ACLU Democrat Communist and his ACLU Democrat Communist agenda. And that they should reconsider their position on the issue given the unsavory types (like you and your ACLU Democrat Communist comrades) with which they are allying.
As for "strident", with your constant demagoguing of the Minuteman Project, its volunteers, and its organizers, you have NO room to talk.
But an admitted ACLU democrat can?
You ought to do standup. If you can't be credible you can at least be funny...
"Commie? Si."
Is that not what you said about yourself? Was that not an admission that you were a communist? If not, please correct the record. But somehow being an ACLU supporting Democrat is still acceptable on a conservative Republican forum? Don't you have anything better to do than come onto this board to stalk and harass conservative Republicans?
You sound like a Nethercott in waiting; just ten mgs away from an uncontrollable rage.
What do you have against protecting our borders?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.