MANIFESTO OF THE WPPFF/WILD TURKEYS/COALITION OF THE SANE

Me. | 29MARCH05 | Long Cut

[verity]

Pooper Scooper Patrol: Clean up on post #2405.

[Peach]

On top of all the other lies he's told, he has a major credibility problem.

I wouldn't choose a doctor from the National Inquirer, would you?

[Peach]

I've only posted the documentation a half a dozen times, but here it is again:

http://home.comcast.net/~trinity_tx/rhodes.htm

[beyond the sea]

It's not a club and the discerning poster may call names where applicable.

That's laughable.

"Discerning posters may call names" ---- that's rich! Did your teacher put a little golden star on your forehead and move you to the front of the class? ;-)

[hobbes1]

see, you guys always run there. Its not about the Nazis.


Its about what Hannah Arendt called the Banality of Evil.


This is that, pure and simple.

[cyncooper]

Why is it laughable?

When one earns a characterization then one can be called on it. When they don't earn a characterization and are attacked falsely and maliciously that is wrong.

I hope that is clear.

Being called pro-death when one is pro-life, for example.

[beyond the sea]

You say calling a well known and respected (by many) politician a fool is " typical FR commentary"? LOL. Maybe it's typical, but it's wrong.

[cyncooper]

Its not about the Nazis.

So that's why you brought it up.

~rolling my eyes~

[sinkspur]

Its not about the Nazis.

Then why did you bring up a Nazi? I didn't.

Using "Nazi" is akin to using the "f" word.

[Dominick]

Amazing drivel from otherwise ordinary people.

FR Thread: Is There a Mysterious Dark Force that Hovers over that Spot Called Pinellas?

sad.

[cyncooper]

But you applauded the comments about Coulter and Crier.

(which were not uttered by me, nor were the Pat B. comments...none of those comments were encompassed in the thread basis)

[SE Mom]

Oomigawd. I went over and browsed that thread- it's...it's...(I'll get back to you when I find the words)

[beyond the sea]

And you had no problem when someone described Ann Coulter as a bitch.

Is that a question or a statement? In fact I know nothing of that "bitch" remark. You're jumping to an incorrect conclusion.

You'll notice my criticism of Catherine Crier focused squarely on comments she had made and not her appearance or personality, yet you popped in to talk about her thin lips.

Yes, that was a little unnecessary of me. I actually find her relatively attractive, but I know it was wrong to introduce that. But, I had a boxer/writer friend years ago who used to use that phrase "thin, cruel lips", and I guess I always liked it as a descriptive phrase, even thought thin lips are really not indicative of anything. But again, it was out of place............ like the "fool" name. ;-) (Had to stick that on the end. ;-) )

[beyond the sea]

I don't have time now, gotta go back outside and deal with some plants.

[beyond the sea]

I wouldn't choose a doctor from the National Inquirer, would you?

Nope................ maybe a fortune teller or something like that. ;-)

[Dominick]

Let me fix this bucko in this case it is:

I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!

You can't cut corners in Justice. Conservatives, real conservatives understand the means and ends are important, and that bad and shoddy means never justify the ends, because the means and the ends are a tautology.

Defending Terri is pursuing justice, you can't pursue justice by mob rule. A militia was offering to come and rescue her, how many people would have been killed?

You are confusing those who want to kill her and who want to save Terri without sacrificing the entire prolife movement. People like you are willing dupes of the DNC. This circus outside the hospice is a tool of those who wish to depose Bush and put Clinton in office, and you are doing their work for them.

[beyond the sea]

When one earns a characterization then one can be called on it. When they don't earn a characterization and are attacked falsely and maliciously that is wrong.

Are you saying that Pat Buchanan is a fool?

[Dominick]

Yes yes I fed the troll. SOme people I can't tolerate after some threads I have seen today.

[cyncooper]

Um, no.

I am tolerating posters' opinions when they back them up and I will directly dispute them if I disagree and I am of a mind to.

I am simply pointing out that characterizing commentators is typical FR fare and not at all what this thread is based on, contrary to what you complained about.

[RebelBanker]

I thought I had a pretty decent vocabulary, but I can not find words to describe that thread either. Somehow "barking moonbats" just does not come within an order of magnitude. Wow.