Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach

No matter the evidence, they can't accept it.

It was the full supreme court today that rejected the appeal. If it had merit, do these people really believe Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas, Kennedy, O'Connor all would have turned it down?

If they were being rational, they would say, the legal issue is on Michael's side.


82 posted on 03/24/2005 4:27:07 PM PST by dogbyte12 (Why do we drive on a parkway and park on a driveway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: dogbyte12

Of course the legal issues are on MS's side. Since when did the conservative party want to get into the sanctity of marriage? It has always been a husband's perogative (for want of a better word) to make medical decisions for his wife, on the advice of doctors, since time began.

People may not like it and they may not like him. But that's the way it is.

And the goverment getting between what has previously been a quiet family matter handled with their doctors is almost obscene to me. This has people in my community seething. We are mostly retired, staunchly conservative people here and we have lots of time and talk, talk, talk (mostly politics and food) and I've only met one person who thinks what Congress did is a good thing.


88 posted on 03/24/2005 4:30:40 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: dogbyte12

That's just it, Schindlers court filings
have never had an ounce of merit, that's
why they haven't won one ruling in all
these years.


90 posted on 03/24/2005 4:30:56 PM PST by the Deejay ( I'LL RESPECT YOUR OPINION....IF YOU'LL RESPECT MINE.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson