Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: dogbyte12

Of course the legal issues are on MS's side. Since when did the conservative party want to get into the sanctity of marriage? It has always been a husband's perogative (for want of a better word) to make medical decisions for his wife, on the advice of doctors, since time began.

People may not like it and they may not like him. But that's the way it is.

And the goverment getting between what has previously been a quiet family matter handled with their doctors is almost obscene to me. This has people in my community seething. We are mostly retired, staunchly conservative people here and we have lots of time and talk, talk, talk (mostly politics and food) and I've only met one person who thinks what Congress did is a good thing.


88 posted on 03/24/2005 4:30:40 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Peach
It has always been a husband's perogative (for want of a better word) to make medical decisions for his wife, on the advice of doctors, since time began.

When Michael beat Terri and broke her ribs, etc., he wasn't performing a medical procedure. And starving a woman to death is not a medical procedure. No doctor in history has ever prescribed murder as a medical procedure--well, maybe Dr. Mengele. You are indulging in Orwellian language-twisting.

2,166 posted on 03/25/2005 11:59:19 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson