Posted on 03/24/2005 2:10:42 PM PST by Truth666
It's obvious that the martyrdom of Terri Schiavo is a satanic ritual. It's supposed to culminate tomorrow, day Jesus Christ died.
I'm sure many of you also have understood it. Instead of continuing listing the details, I will let you do it yourselves.
I burped.
the Deejay wrote:
Won't be surprised if they jump through my pc and bite me.
We need a poll to see when FR "Jumped The Shark".
I can attest to your youth!
Besides that, your mind remains brilliant!
SIGH.
First, you and I are actually on the same side.
However, you seem intent on fighting with people today.
So *I* was simply ignoring you.
Now many FReepers are cheering attempts to subvert the Constitution, shopping for judicial venues, and even making threats.
When the left made attempts to stick its nose into marriages, conservatives told them to butt out and that the government had no business driving wedges between husband and wife.
Now many FReepers encourage government interference and claim that parents should have more say than a spouse over what pillow talk might have occurred.
When the left would lead their children out to protest marches, conservatives would rightfully decry the exploitation of children for political purposes.
Now many FReepers are cheering parents who get their children arrested.
I have fought for conservatism for decades, at great personal cost. I lurked at FreeRepublic for years before posting, and loved it dearly. So it disturbs me now that FreeRepublic has become a dirty word and laughing stock among many conservatives. I am so glad to see some backlash against the nuttiness!
Where have the conservatives gone, and why does so much of FR no longer stand for conservative values? Why has the inflamatory rhetoric taken the place of the rationality (that was the hallmark of OUR side, against the emotional rantings of the left)? How many FReepers have even read the Constitution or The Federalist Papers these days?
Truth666 is a party of one.
Would someone be willing to post this on the open forum?
This contains a LOT of information that freepers have refused to believe including something I've told naysayers but they just won't believe it:
This document notes that Mr. Pearse failed to mention in his report that Michael Schiavo had earlier, formally offered to divest himself entirely of his financial interest in the guardianship estate. The
What's "LP"?
*hugs* Is it any wonder why I adore you so? lol
Hey, don't go too hard on him. At least the imitator is not spamming the boards with long, repetitious, poorly formatted reposts like the original used to do!
LOL!
This document should be read by everyone.
Also, this puts to bed the lie that I've been told repeatedly that the Schindlers were never able to call their own witnesses:
Most of the motions in these efforts were denied, but not without apparent careful and detailed review by the court, often involving hearings at which considerable latitude was afforded the Schindlers in their efforts to proffer testimony and admit evidence.
To whoever hit abuse on G.Mason and post #184, THANKS.
I have used this statement and been told it was a lie, despite giving links to it.
It is evidence, imo, that the Schindlers are deeply dysfunctional. This is NOT love:
Testimony provided by members of the Schindler family included very personal statements about their desire and intention to ensure that Theresa remain alive. Throughout the course of the litigation, deposition and trial testimony by members of the Schindler family voiced the disturbing belief that they would keep Theresa alive at any and all costs. Nearly gruesome examples were given, eliciting agreement by family members that in the event Theresa should contract diabetes and subsequent gangrene in each of her limbs, they would agree to amputate each limb, and would then, were she to be diagnosed with heart disease, perform open heart surgery. There was additional, difficult testimony that appeared to establish that despite the sad and undesirable condition of Theresa, the parents still derived joy from having her alive, even if Theresa might not be at all aware of her environment given the persistent vegetative state. Within the testimony, as part of the hypotheticals presented, Schindler family members stated that even if Theresa had told them of her intention to have artificial nutrition withdrawn, they would not do it. Throughout this painful and difficult trial, the family acknowledged that Theresa was in a diagnosed persistent vegetative state.
Hang in there, Howlin!
If I may be of help, the issue began with my post #1,126.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.