[jboot]

ftd comments that he doubts some Calvinists are saved and Frumanchu gets erased? What's the story?

Fru's a Calvinist, FTD's not. 'Nuff said.

[nobdysfool]

Fru's a Calvinist, FTD's not. 'Nuff said.

Well, there's more that could be said, but I think most people can figure it out. We're all supposed to be equal here, but apparently some are more equal than others.

[fortheDeclaration]

ftd comments that he doubts some Calvinists are saved and Frumanchu gets erased? What's the story? Fru's a Calvinist, FTD's not. 'Nuff said.

Well, I did not doubt that some Calvinists were saved, I questioned one on what Gospel he was believing for salvation.

That came (in context) on a discussion on the posting of Scofield's view of 4 Gospels (based on Dispensational distinctions)

Just to correct the record on what I did say.

[P-Marlowe]

Fru's a Calvinist, FTD's not. 'Nuff said.

So the Calvinist religion moderator is prejudiced against Calvinists? Is that the implication?

I doubt some Arminians are saved. Big Deal. There are tares on both sides of this issue.

Now if FTD wants to throw a fit complaining that because I doubted that all arminians are saved, that I am accusing him of being unsaved, and if he harps on it for the next 100 posts and ignores a warning by the Moderator to knock it off, then I would expect that he would be taking some time off Free Republic as well.

Somehow I don't think FTD would take that comment personally.