Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Something that the Union strategy made impossible. By very early in 1862 the south was almost completely cut in half. With but one or two exceptions there was no place where the south could cross the Mississippi and link up with rail lines. By mid-1863 that was gone.

Well, you've outlined the problem in the West. As history saw, the Confederate government didn't come up with a solution for it -- didn't even try hard, until Chickamauga, to effect some check to the Union's progress.

And as I said, significant resources sat idle in Texas, protecting rice and sugar-cane fields.

4,936 posted on 04/13/2005 12:57:15 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4887 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus
Well, you've outlined the problem in the West. As history saw, the Confederate government didn't come up with a solution for it -- didn't even try hard, until Chickamauga, to effect some check to the Union's progress.

I would disagree that the south didn't even try, they just kept getting whipped. At Iuka, at Perryville, at Stone River, at Shiloh, at Memphis and New Orleans and Fort Donalson, The south had too much border to defend and too few troops and competent leaders to defend it.

4,964 posted on 04/13/2005 3:54:00 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4936 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson