Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Au contrair, you are forgetting the War of Southern Rebellion, 1861 to 1865.

The War Between the States was not a rebellion. There was no rebellion -- except in West Virginia, which threw off the lawful authority of the State of Virginia and her government, and sought protection from a military tyrant.

And the south was not within it's rights to rebel.

A fair statement, as far as it goes. Had they rebelled, they almost certainly would not have been in the right. However, there was no rebellion.

4,186 posted on 04/04/2005 7:08:20 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4184 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus
The War Between the States was not a rebellion. There was no rebellion -- except in West Virginia, which threw off the lawful authority of the State of Virginia and her government, and sought protection from a military tyrant.

Considering that the souther acts of secession were illegal then it certainly was a rebellion.

A fair statement, as far as it goes. Had they rebelled, they almost certainly would not have been in the right. However, there was no rebellion.

But there was.

4,190 posted on 04/04/2005 7:34:21 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4186 | View Replies ]

To: lentulusgracchus; Grand Old Partisan; capitan_refugio; fortheDeclaration; Non-Sequitur; Heyworth
More examples of Neo-Confederate P/C spin-o-rama, equaling the worst of Tommy Dela-dementia's vicious anti-American rantings.

"The War Between the States (The Civil War?) was not a rebellion. There was no rebellion -- except in West Virginia, which threw off the lawful authority of the State of Virginia and her government, and sought protection from a military tyrant." The elected United States government is the military tyrant?

The rebellion continues in 2005!

Quoting: 'Isham G. Harris, the fire-eating governor of Tennessee, wrote to Jefferson Davis, "The burning of railroad bridges in East Tennessee shows a deep-seated spirit of rebellion in that section. Union men are organizing. This rebellion must be crushed out instantly, the leaders arrested, and summarily punished."

Wow, what was that again? Pro-slaver secessionists arresting elected popular political leaders in Eastern Tenn & loyal Americans fighting for the Union must be "crushed out instantly, the leaders arrested, and summarily punished!"" (i.e., gunned down for being loyal American citizens?)

'The vote for secession followed closely the distribution of slaves or the number of bales of cotton produced in Alabama. Winston County held only 122 slaves, or 3.41% of the population, and in most of the loyal counties, the proportion of slaves was less than 20%. However, substantial Unionist sentiment was found even in the plantation counties. In Green County, with 76.5% of the population being African slaves, nearly 40% of voters wished to remain within the Union.'

'The Confederates felt justified in executing men who had left the Confederate Cause to join the Union. Yet, these men claimed the only reason they wore the Gray was because of the draft, and had they been given a choice, they would have worn the Blue in the first place.'

Below another example of insane pro-slavery double talk:

"Every one acquainted with Southern slaves knows that the slave rejoices in the elevation and prosperity of his master." Virgina Professor Thomas R. Dew, 1852

Today's Neo-Confederate hidden agenda is dedicated to turning the clock back some 150 years.

4,229 posted on 04/04/2005 8:41:07 PM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson