Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: M. Espinola
should have tasted the very slavery they dished out for at least one year, and then maybe Reconstruction could have been more meaningful.

Reconstruction had nothing to do with slavery. Good to see you're still trying, though.

2,636 posted on 02/14/2005 3:26:59 AM PST by Gianni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2630 | View Replies ]


To: Gianni
"Reconstruction had nothing to do with slavery."

Similar to other cultic neo-Confederate myths:

"Slavery had nothing to do with the Civil War." "

"Slaves were really better off on a Southern plantations, and should have stayed there."

"The only good blacks were those forced to fight for for southern slave masters. "

"President Lincoln started the Civil War because he was an arch racist, fruitcake and a tyrant, coupled with having nothing better to do with his time in the White House."

"There is no such thing as the secessionist neo-confederate movement, it's an invention of 'Northerners' who hate grits."

"The term 'all men are created equal' only applies to hardcore neo-confederates."

"The Emancipation Proclamation was totally unnecessary since Southern slaves would have been freed in 50, 100, 150 years, anyway."


2,651 posted on 02/14/2005 12:44:43 PM PST by M. Espinola (Freedom is never free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2636 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson