Posted on 12/21/2004 12:25:42 PM PST by hk409
Edited on 12/21/2004 12:54:14 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
Here! Too busy at work to FReep much today, for obvious reasons, but I'm here.
In Daegu, South Korea one deranged individual-armed only with a milk carton filled with flammable liquids like nitroglycerin and a few matches-was able to slaughter hundreds of innocent, helpless individuals.
So the likelihood that a pre-existing, intricately structured terrorist organization would be able to replicate that sort of carnage-and possibly even eclipse it in terms of body count-is great, unfortunately.
The subway is the best avenue to instill fear and terror-without expending too many resources-if you're an Islamic fanatic.
It's self-contained, underground entity, which holds thousands of people at any given time-and at rush hour, as during this attack, hundreds of thousands-and by its very nature facilitates whatever implement of death chosen by the murderers, e.g. asphyxiating smoke, fire, deadly chemical aerosols or biological contagions, etc...
There was an attempt to detonate multiple bombs at Union St.-on the R line, which is my subway line-back in 1997.
The only thing that prevented this plot from coming off-and subsequently killing hundreds of commuters-was the fact that one of the conspirators had second thoughts, and decided to tip off the NYPD.
I think that the lesson here-aside from learning that you can't appease someone who is intent upon your destruction-is that terrorists always strike at the most vulnerable point.
Excellent information. Those of us in the 'burbs are definitely looking at things differently from city-dwellers.
BTW: Do you take a bus to 69th or 59th or do you actually hoof it from Dyker Heights. Nice neighborhood, but their is no subway service.
You're right though.
Mass transit in this neighborhood is the worst..
I think the three worst lines in the system-at least, according to the Straphanger's Campaign-are the M, N, and R.
Perhaps now Britain will reconsider the ease with which they grant student visas to Muslims from any country. They can move around in Great Britain at will, and don't even have to prove they are "students."
We learned our lessons on 9/11...
Hello, 'Face!
Maybe.
Maybe not.
The liberals in Britain are just as evil and dense as the liberals here.
They will conclude that the attacks happened because there aren't ENOUGH muslims in Britain.
Hi!
Still hot on Puget Sound?
Let's hope it doesn't take a 9/11 over there to wise them up.
That is so sad.
I'm hoping that this is all they need to wisen up.
Unfortunately, it will probably take a few of the liberal pols dying in an attack to wisen them up.
Same thing happening to a few libs here would be what it would take to wisen the libs here up.
Unfortunately.
No, it's beautiful. Low 70's, nice and sunny.
There is NO difference between Iqbal Sacranie and Abu Hamza, or Omar Bakri, aside from a few decorative prosthetic hooks.
The distinction between Hizb ut-Tahrir and the National Council of Muslims, or CAIR is not negligible...IT DOES NOT EXIST!
The sooner people wake up and realize that salient fact, the better.
Decorative hooks.. lol!
Another excellent post.
Whopper of a thunderstorm here.
Nice here, too...109/8%
:o]
Sure, if you like living inside a toaster oven. :-)
104 yesterday.
Too bad my job won't let me bring my pistol from the car. I'm not exactly sure at what temp those primers are going to cook off. Magazine isn't in the pistol, but I don't wanna lose the mag either.
It was published on the eve of the most British parliamentary elections, when there was a very hotly-contested race between then Labor MP Oona King and disgraced Saddam Hussein apologist George Galloway.
The thrust of the piece focused on the sheer inability of either candidate to appease the most intractable, obscurantist, radical factions within their Muslim constituencies, who were guided by imams who demanded that their flock forswear participatory democracy altogether.
Though, the anti-Semitic, anti-American Galloway managed to garner a significant percentage of the Muslim vote, he still could not assuage the doubts of the most entrenched, wild-eyed Islamic fanatics.
There is no amount of appeasement that will satisfy people who prefer to structure their lives around archaic hadiths rather than rational thought and innovative scriptural interpretation.
If you belong to the Hanafi school, then the Hanabali's will chastise you for not being pure of heart.
If you follow Tamiyya, the Wahabbists will condemn you.
This is a downward-spiraling, comsumptive, nihilistic cult of death.
People who haven't realized that soon enough, and come up with proportional prophylactic measures to address this challenge, have met with their demise.
Kemal Attaturk knew what he was doing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.