To: Shryke
His Phd happens to be in American Studies. Perhaps I am missing how that qualifies his opinions concerning biology. Enlighten me, please.
Jack Cashill's argument was with the misquotes by scientists of the Pope's position on evolution at the Kansas Board of Education meeting. It appears you are suggesting a Ph.D. is not qualified to write when scientists misquote the Pope.
270 posted on
11/29/2004 9:22:46 AM PST by
GarySpFc
(Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
To: GarySpFc
It appears you are suggesting a Ph.D. is not qualified to write when scientists misquote the Pope.I am pointing out that your quoted PhD, who has no training in biology, is not only opining on the validity of evolution via quoting others (like Behe and his "groundbreaking" book), but producing anti-evolution films as well.
It vaguely reminds me of Michael Moore's "documentaries".
318 posted on
11/29/2004 10:02:40 AM PST by
Shryke
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson