Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Oztrich Boy
What a cute irrelevancy.

Why not try and honestly address the question I posted?

133 posted on 11/29/2004 8:14:09 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]


To: r9etb
He did. You said "teach both". It has been correctly pointed out that it's not a matter of teaching "both" because it's not just evolution vs. a single specific creation account, but you apparently don't like that so you want to duck the issue.

Of course, what no one has brought up is that none of the other accounts actually qualify as science.
145 posted on 11/29/2004 8:19:24 AM PST by Dimensio (Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: r9etb

Are you suggesting that all possible intelligent designers not be considered? Thats as bad as not considering all conceivable Creators.


147 posted on 11/29/2004 8:20:13 AM PST by Oztrich Boy ("Ain't I a stinker?" B Bunny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson