"see we really don't know what happened we have a police report from one side of the incident, I wish we had video..."
Exactly! And, you are supporting this side (ie, Vang's) of the incident. Yet, in the statement above you state that Vang's report of what happened is not enough. So, everything you have stated in this thread is based on insufficient and one-sided evidence. Still you support Vang's actions indirectly by stating ad nauseam that Vang is the victim.
Don't expect the other side to come out and support your already frail arguments.
Boya, you're digging yourself into a deeper and deeper hole.