"I never claimed to be neutral. I am quite opposed to zealots, of any ideology or religion."
So in other words, you're not a conservative. You don't agree with the words of JR I quoted above. You consider him a zealot.
As far as your support of the "gay" agenda, it's all over the place, on this thread.
You claim of apathy is pathetic. You are a zealot, just on the side of hedonism and atheism.
So, to be a conservative, one has to be a zealot?
You don't agree with the words of JR
Nonsense. I don't agree with you, however.
You consider him a zealot.
Nonsense. I consider you a zealot. You're the mirro-image of the radical gay activist, in a lot of ways.
As far as your support of the "gay" agenda, it's all over the place, on this thread.
Specific example, please. Point out a statement of mine that supports the gay agenda.
You are a zealot, just on the side of hedonism and atheism.
I couldn't care less whether people live their lives as hedonists versus as puritans, nor do I care whether people are deeply religious or atheistic. That makes me a zealot?
Though you may not admit of any god, at least you're open that you're quite opposed to the God of the Bible. The God of the Bible is one who openly concedes on its pages that He is zealous. The Son of God of the Bible, Jesus Christ, even picked Simon the Zealot as one of His followers.
As long as you're on record as being firmly opposed to the God of the Bible and the historical figure of Jesus Christ, we know the essentials of your worldview in a nutshell.