We have discussed ping lists before.
Especially when you choose to use my name in a post in a negative (and less than forthright) way please give me a separate ping and not at the end of a list.
We have? You must not have pinged me to that discussion as I haven't the faintest idea of what you are talking about.
In reality, however, the issue of a ping list does not apply here.
I pinged, not from a list, but I pinged the person who I was responding to, three people I mentioned in my post (yourself included) and one more person who I thought would be interested in the neonomianism aspect of the post since he and I had discussed that issue before..
”Especially when you choose to use my name in a post in a negative (and less than forthright) way…“
I’m a little confused by this thought. Are you now denying that you entertained and flirted with Open Theism a couple of years ago?
Furthermore, I don’t think it is accurate to suggest that I presented you in a negative light. After all, it ~IS~ ACCURATE that you seriously entertained and flirted with Open Theism a couple of years ago. But it is also accurate that you finally rejected it –I would think that is definitely positive!
”…please give me a separate ping and not at the end of a list.
Besides pinging the person I was responding to, notice that the pings are in the order of who I mentioned with the exception of lockeliberty. In reality, I was simply thinking of the names in my head as I typed them out. I should have put you before lockeliberty as I mentioned your name and not his. For that I apologize.
But really, where is there a rule that says you need to be given a “separate ping”????
Isn’t this complaint actually a bit petty?
Jean