We have? You must not have pinged me to that discussion as I haven't the faintest idea of what you are talking about.
In reality, however, the issue of a ping list does not apply here.
I pinged, not from a list, but I pinged the person who I was responding to, three people I mentioned in my post (yourself included) and one more person who I thought would be interested in the neonomianism aspect of the post since he and I had discussed that issue before..
”Especially when you choose to use my name in a post in a negative (and less than forthright) way…“
I’m a little confused by this thought. Are you now denying that you entertained and flirted with Open Theism a couple of years ago?
Furthermore, I don’t think it is accurate to suggest that I presented you in a negative light. After all, it ~IS~ ACCURATE that you seriously entertained and flirted with Open Theism a couple of years ago. But it is also accurate that you finally rejected it –I would think that is definitely positive!
”…please give me a separate ping and not at the end of a list.
Besides pinging the person I was responding to, notice that the pings are in the order of who I mentioned with the exception of lockeliberty. In reality, I was simply thinking of the names in my head as I typed them out. I should have put you before lockeliberty as I mentioned your name and not his. For that I apologize.
But really, where is there a rule that says you need to be given a “separate ping”????
Isn’t this complaint actually a bit petty?
Jean
Please do not include me on your PING LISTS, whether you call them impromptu lists or saved lists. It is customary on these threads to respect another freeper's desire not to be on your lists.
Please do not ping me as part of ANY list. This leaves you free to ping me separately which is within established guidelines.