Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: capitan_refugio
As usual, capitan_refugio cannot contest what has been said, he can only call the writer names. That the writer was quoting Daniel Webster and the United States Supreme Court does not matter. He is naturally Kerry-like in his ability.

CARL SANDBURG at encyclopedia.com

Sandburg's most ambitious work was his six-volume biography of Abraham Lincoln (1926-39); this monumental work exalts Lincoln as the symbol and embodiment of the American spirit. The last four volumes won the Pulitzer Prize.

Sandburg noted that poor Whites were worse off than enslaved field hands who had better "quantities of food, clothing, shelter, and employment..." (Abraham Lincoln, The War Years, 4 vols., New York, 1939, Volume 1, page 11.) Indeed, there was little unemployment among the slaves. For pointing that out, Sandburg definitely earned an award.

Of course, the Illinois poet who gets showered with Lincolnian praise would be Carl Sandburg who prostituted his writing talents to shill for the following lie, which Sandburg penned in a letter of July 16, 1929 to Paul M. Angle: "the use of the word 'Nigger' was never indulged in by Lincoln unless he was quoting somebody..." Just who was Lincoln quoting at the sixth Lincoln-Douglas debate when, in front of 15,000 witnesses, Lincoln denied he wanted a "Nigger wife?" In the last debate, in front of 4,000 witnesses, Lincoln averred he had "no taste for running and catching niggers." Who was he quoting that time? In Carlinville, Lincoln opened a speech with, "the question is often asked, why this fuss about niggers?" A year later, in Elwood, Kansas, Lincoln said, "People often ask, why make such a fuss about a few niggers." It is efforts such as Sandburg's which win Lincoln awards and the Pulitzer.

Lincoln asserted the accuracy of Robert Roberts Hitt, the shorthand expert who reported the Lincoln-Douglas debates for the Chicago Tribune and included various N-bombs. Lincoln himself corrected the debate manuscripts before they were published as a collection, changed poorly chosen words and didn't edit or evince any qualms about the recorded N-bombs. Lincoln said, "In my own speeches, I have corrected only a few small typographical errors." Obviously, he did not consider the recorded N-bombs to be errors. One wonders who Sandburg thought Lincoln was quoting.

ALL LINKS go to the Complete Works of Abraham Lincoln, Roy. P. Basler. Italics in original.


| Speech at Carlinville, Illinois, August 31, 1858 |

He [Lincoln] said the question is often asked, why this fuss about niggers?


| Speech at Elwood, Kansas, December 1 [November 30?], 1859 |

People often ask, ``why make such a fuss about a few niggers?''


|CW 2:396, Springfield, May 25, 1857. |

There is no longer any difficult question of jurisdiction in the Federal courts; they have jurisdiction in all possible cases, except such as might redound to the benefit of a "nigger'' in some way.


| First Debate with Stephen Douglas, Ottawa, Illinois, August 21, 1858 |

[CW 3:20] When my friend, Judge Douglas, came to Chicago, on the 9th of July, this speech having been delivered on the 16th of June, he made an harangue there, in which he took hold of this speech of mine, showing that he had carefully read it; and while he paid no attention to this matter at all, but complimented me as being a "kind, amiable, and intelligent gentleman,'' notwithstanding I had said this; he goes on and eliminates, or draws out, from my speech this tendency of mine to set the States at war with one another, to make all the institutions uniform, and set the niggers and white people to marrying together.

[CW 3:27] There is no danger that the people of Kentucky will shoulder their muskets and with a young nigger stuck on every bayonet march into Illinois and force them upon us.


| Third Lincoln-Douglas debate,Jonesboro, Illinois, September 15, 1858 |

We have seen many a "nigger'' that we thought more of than some white men.


| Speech at Springfield, Illinois June 10, 1856 |

He would occasionally launch out and lead his hearers to think that the most ultra abolitionism would follow, when, under the old whig eyes we have mentioned, he would soften his remarks to a supposed palatable texture. In this way, backing and filling, he frittered away anything of argument that he might have presented, convincing his audience, however, that his niggerism has as dark a hue as that of Garrison or Fred Douglass but that his timidity before the peculiar audience he addressed prevented its earnest advocacy with the power and ability he is known to possess. ... To attain power, by whatever means, was the burden of his song, and he pointed to the complexion of the Bloomington ticket as evidence of the desire of the factions to attain it by any process.


| August 9, 1856 |

Lincoln then took the stand and made a three hours speech. It was prosy and dull in the extreme---all about ``freedom,'' ``liberty'' and niggers.


| Speech at Edwardsville, Illinois, September 11, 1858 |

Then if Mr. Douglas did not invent this kind of Sovereignty, let us pursue the inquiry and find out what the invention really was. Was it the right of emigrants in Kansas and Nebraska to govern themselves and a gang of niggers too, if they wanted them? Clearly this was no invention of his, because Gen. Cass put forth the same doctrine in 1848, in his so-called Nicholson letter, six years before Douglas thought of such a thing. Gen. Cass could have taken out a patent for the idea, if he had chosen to do so, and have prevented his Illinois rival from reaping a particle of benefit from it. Then what was it, I ask again, that this ``Little Giant'' invented? It never occurred to Gen. Cass to call his discovery by the odd name of ``Popular Sovereignty.'' He had not the impudence to say that the right of people to govern niggers was the right of people to govern themselves. His notions of the fitness of things were not moulded to the brazen degree of calling the right to put a hundred niggers through under the lash in Nebraska, a "sacred right of self-government." And here, I submit to this intelligent audience and the whole world, was Judge Douglas' discovery, and the whole of it. He invented a name for Gen. Cass' old Nicholson letter dogma. He discovered that the right of the white man to breed and flog niggers in Nebraska was POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY!

Chicago Press and Tribune, September 11, 1858.

Way to go Abe!! Dropped the N-bomb four times in one paragraph in a public speech.


| Speech at Edwardsville, Illinois, September 11, 1858 |

Then, if Mr. Douglas did not invent this kind of sovereignty, let us pursue the inquiry and find out what the invention really was. Was it the right of emigrants in Kansas and Nebraska to govern themselves and a gang of niggers too, if they wanted them? Clearly this was no invention of his, because Gen. Cass put forth the same doctrine in 1848, in his so-called Nicholson letter---six whole years before Douglas thought of such a thing. Gen. Cass could have taken out a patent for the idea, if he had chosen to do so, and have prevented his Illinois rival from reaping a particle of benefit from it. Then what was it, I ask again, that this ``Little Giant'' invented? It never occurred to Gen. Cass to call his discovery by the odd name of ``Popular Sovereignty.'' He had not the impudence to say that the right of people to govern niggers was the right of people to govern themselves. His notions of the fitness of things were not moulded to the brazen degree of calling the right to put a hundred niggers through under the lash in Nebraska, a "sacred right of self-government." And here, I submit to this intelligent audience and the whole world, was Judge Douglas' discovery, and the whole of it. He invented a name for Gen. Cass' old Nicholson letter dogma. He discovered that the right of the white man to breed and flog niggers in Nebraska was POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY!---[Great applause and laughter.]

Alton Weekly Courier, September 16, 1858.

Way to go Abe!! Quite a stump speech you have going there! Different newspaper, still four n-bombs.


| Seventh and Last Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Alton, Illinois, October 15, 1858 |

We profess to have no taste for running and catching niggers---at least I profess no taste for that job at all. Why then do I yield support to a fugitive slave law? Because I do not understand that the Constitution, which guarantees that right, can be supported without it.


| Editor of the Central Transcript. Springfield, July 3, 1859 |

Dear Sir:

Your fling about men entangled with the "Matteson Robbery" as you express it; and men indicted for stealing niggers and mail-bags, I think is unjust and impolitic. Why manufacture slang to be used against us by our enemies? The world knows who are alluded to by the mention of stealing niggers and mail-bags; and as to the Canal script fraud, the charge of being entangled with it, would be as just, if made against you, as against any other Republican in the State.


| Speech at Council Bluffs, Iowa, August 13, 1859 |

He then, with many excuses and a lengthy explanation, as if conscious of the nauseous nature of that Black Republican nostrum, announced his intention to speak about the "eternal Negro," to use his own language, and entered into a lengthy and ingenious analysis of the Nigger question, impressing upon his hearers that it was the only question to be agitated until finally settled.


| Speech at Clinton, Illinois October 14, 1859 |

He then spoke of the evils and disasters attending the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, by which the barriers protecting freedom and free labor were broken down and the Territories transformed into asylums for slavery and niggers....


| Speech at Hartford, Connecticut, March 5, 1860 |

[Daily Courant Version]

They say that between the nigger and the crocodile they go for the nigger. The proportion, therefore, is, that as the crocodile to the nigger so is the nigger to the white man.



2,688 posted on 10/08/2004 12:58:00 AM PDT by nolu chan (What's the frequency?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2684 | View Replies ]


To: nolu chan
Tell me, how does your foul-mouthed, tight-fisted little rant add to the discussion? I didn't bring up Sandburg. I don't recall ever quoting from Sandburg.

You are an embarassment to Free Republic.

2,690 posted on 10/08/2004 1:20:24 AM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2688 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson