As a Christian, Bible-based organization, our goals are different.
How would that be different? Different from searching for truth?
Actually, yes.
"Creation science" is a terrible oxymoron. Science is about the pursuit of knowledge. When proven incorrect, scientists disregard their hypotheses. Creationists just talk louder.
Name calling is the best you can do. But is there any real substance related to your gripes? Certainly, there are some Creationists that don't have a scientific background. And a subset of this group doesn't know what they are talking about. But you seem to think there are no questions related to science. You seem to think that the scientific community has it all figured out. Is this true? Is macro-evolution established fact? Have we gone back into time and observed it? Hardly!
Perhaps, just one of you could present some evidence explaining the difference between ID and the creation movement. Specifically, what are the arguments against evolution? What does the Intelligent Design community say and how do their arguments challenge naturalism -- specifically what does Dr Dembski say? Do the Creationists have no arguments against evolution? Is their framework totally without merit?
You all seem to be parrots of the academic establishment, intellectually devoid of balance, unwilling to look at another point of view. Most of you seem to be ignorant and don't know what you are talking about!