Replies

Not to belabor the point, but I am very curious about this:

(from Final Phase- Sean Osborne Lomax)

I gave some information to a couple of select people earlier this afternoon.

The Northeast Intelligence Network is going to issue a report on what we now know in our HQ Intel-Alert Newsletter first. It is due for release this evening.

From our mainpage:

Quote:

In the HQ INEL-ALERT to be released Saturday night, just how close was the US to "losing a city" this week to a nuclear detonation? According to our inside government sources, "extremely close." In this issue, we offer up-to-the minute and in-depth investigative findings on this frightening topic, which seems to be coincidently timed with author Paul L. Williams' newly released book Osama's Revenge, America's next 9/11.

Are you prepared?

OK- So is he in effect saying that we found a nuke or nukes that were set to go off? That if we had not found them, a city would ALREADY have been nuked?

Or is he saying we found a nuke or nukes stashed- awaiting some further time to be detonated?

What do you folks think?

Incidentally, there is also some news reportedly about OBL that was given mention during tonights Rita Cosby Foxnews program. Working on confirmation of the report now.

Reportedly ... the information was contained in a FoxNews Breaking News Alert" at approximately 9:30 PM. The report involved "chatter" from some detainee that Bin Laden's health was "rapidly deteriorating".

More as it develops.

Interesting stuff jerseygirl. Laura, can you give us any info at all on this? I know it is in the pay section, but anything at all would be helpful.

OK- So is he in effect saying that we found a nuke or nukes that were set to go off? That if we had not found them, a city would ALREADY have been nuked? Or is he saying we found a nuke or nukes stashed- awaiting some further time to be detonated? What do you folks think?

I think someone is trying to solicite paying subscribers, which I don't necessarily have a problem with because I am a capitalist. As to the merits of the claim, call me a skeptic, but I suspect the detailed report of the nuke incident referenced in the teaser is based upon super-secret, unspecified information, from unnamed sources that can't be verified or debunked.

no comment

I think if some type of nuclear weapon had been found, it would have been pasted on the evening news by every alphabet channel in the country as verfication of terrorists possessing WMD.

I would take it with a grain of salt until some official type of corroboration appears, but we all know the Gov seems to reject labeling anything as terrorist related.

Remember, the Northeast Intelligence Network are the same folks who told us OBL was captured in January of 2004. (According to well-placed sources). Not long after the OBL prediction, that site went to selling special info by subscription.

The source is very dubious. I know we are all looking at every scrap of raw intelligence we can, but I am mindful that some out there have motives other than national security.

Having said that, just because a witness is wrong, or possibly even misleading, doesn't mean that everything the witness says is a lie. But in my experience, a smart jury will require something more before believing such a witness.