To: freeperfromnj
AND, London was suppose to be attacked first. Could New London be the actual target?
3,193 posted on
07/23/2004 4:28:05 PM PDT by
Calpernia
(Kerry is a egghead, he is a egghead and Cal is a walrus, coo coo cachoo)
To: Calpernia
Now that's an interesting thought. Why single out little old CT for such a sophisticated test? We need to find out what's in Old London.
To: Calpernia
In the 1950's New London was near the submarine training base for our navy, we lived there for a few months.
I don't recall the location of the sub base.
3,198 posted on
07/23/2004 4:32:01 PM PDT by
nw_arizona_granny
(You could do a general Google search for: jihad internet today)
To: Calpernia
Calpernia I think you are really on to something. Google up New London landmarks and see what comes up.
To: Calpernia
"London was suppose to be attacked first. Could New London be the actual target?"
Dingdingdingdingding!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson