No, that's a question.
Remember, Narses: one can easily become schismatic by becoming "attached" to SSPX.
Maxie can answer for himself, I think.
In fact, I hear the sibilance of a schizzie now--old UR, the most attached "non-member" has arrived to slander JPII, his Mother the Church, and anyone else handy.
It's a dishonest question. Further, you are (as sinky is) trying to use ad hominem attacks rather than discuss the issues. It is shameful.
"one can easily become schismatic by becoming "attached" to SSPX."
One can easily lose the faith entirely if one doesn't.
Still trying to get away with the deceptive insinuation that posters can somehow become schismatic by simply arguing in favor of the Society, when not even Society worshipers themselves are schismatic?
Maybe the hopelessly ignorant or those who sniffed oily rags as children would believe your silly vomit, but people with brains don't.
Then again you were the one that came in here and seriously (or drunkenly) advocated torture for society members, so there's no telling what you'll say on any given night.