"Not!"
Not getting your point here.
What's wrong with correcting a translation?
"What's wrong with correcting a translation?"
Nothing! My point is that it hasn't been corrected in 40 years, and it is still being defended, tooth and nail, as a "proper" translation.
Instead the "pen" was used to supposedly "excommunicate" the bishops of, and declare "schismatic", the only priestly society, at the time, who refused to offer a Holy Mass with such a defective translation, among many other reasons.