Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Priests 'In Orgy' at Seminary
news.scotsman.com ^ | July 12, 2004

Posted on 07/12/2004 10:26:32 AM PDT by Land of the Irish

Roman Catholic leaders in Austria called an emergency meeting today after officials discovered a vast cache of photos and videos allegedly depicting young priests having sex at a seminary.

About 40,000 photographs and an undisclosed number of films, including child pornography, were downloaded on computers at the seminary in St Poelten, about 50 miles west of Vienna, the respected news magazine Profil reported.

Officials with the local diocese declined to comment but were meeting privately on the scandal, Austrian state television reported.

It said the seminary’s director, the Rev Ulrich Kuechl, and his deputy, Wolfgang Rothe, had resigned.

The Austrian Bishops Conference issued a statement today pledging a full and swift investigation.

“Anything that has to do with homosexuality or pornography has no place at a seminary for priests,” it said.

Church officials discovered the material on a computer at the seminary, Profil said. It published several images purportedly showing young priests and their instructors kissing and fondling each other and engaging in orgies and sex games.

The child porn came mostly from web sites based in Poland, the magazine said.

Bishop Kurt Krenn, a conservative churchman who oversees the St Poelten Diocese, told Austrian television he had seen photos of seminary leaders in sexual situations with students. Krenn, however, dismissed the photos as “silly pranks” that “had nothing to do with homosexuality”.

A group of St. Poelten Diocese officials planned to ask the Vatican to remove Krenn as bishop, Austrian radio reported.

Vatican spokesman Ciro Benedettini told the Austria Press Agency that the Holy See had no comment.

Krenn, 68, issued a statement calling the accusations groundless while conceding that he “may have made some wrong personnel decisions” at the seminary.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 501-513 next last
To: sinkspur

"I don't care where you attend Mass. Drop it."

Why have you asked then on thread after thread?


161 posted on 07/12/2004 8:08:34 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
It's not "wickedness." If we were to meet, tomorrow night, we'd all have a beer together.

It IS wicked, a disgrace. Its no better than the "Priests 'In Orgy' at Seminary."

You have baited asnd harassed narses till he's beside himself, yet you think its just havin' a little fun. That IS wicked.

162 posted on 07/12/2004 8:08:37 PM PDT by Polycarp IV (PRO-LIFE orthodox Catholic - -without exception, without compromise, without apology. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio

Watch Dioceses ready to go BANKRUPT allow the Indult. My Diocese will likely file in the fall or winter. Just about then, voila`, an Indult will appear.


163 posted on 07/12/2004 8:09:54 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: gbcdoj
The Masses they celebrate are also valid, but it is considered morally illicit for the faithful to participate in these Masses unless they are physically or morally impeded from participating in a Mass celebrated by a Catholic priest in good standing (cf. Code of Canon Law, canon 844.2).

So it is NOT morally illicit to participate in an SSPX if you are morally impeded from participating in a New Mass travesty. It is morally impossible for me to set foot in a New Mass church. I don't mind attending an indult Mass if it's available, but it's not necessary to have an indult, and it IS morally necessary for me to attend only the true Catholic Mass of all time.

164 posted on 07/12/2004 8:11:11 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp IV; sinkspur

In my obstinate self-righteousness, I have been unwilling to shut up and accept the good Deacons efforts to 'drop it'. My apologies. Hopefully we will here no more personal attacks on either side.


165 posted on 07/12/2004 8:11:41 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: narses

here=hear


166 posted on 07/12/2004 8:12:37 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: GirlShortstop
Every Catholic has a right to the sacraments (cf. Code of Canon Law, canon 843), but he does not have a right to them according to the rite of his choice.

The Roman Rite is not some "rite of choice." It is the pre-eminent and normative rite in the Latin Church. It is the oldest rite and most directly descended from the apostles. It is the Rite which was guaranteed to all Roman Catholics for all futurity of time.

167 posted on 07/12/2004 8:13:19 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian; gbcdoj

Clearly. Given a choice between a gay parish and the SSPX, what choice have you?


168 posted on 07/12/2004 8:13:32 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: GirlShortstop

Wrong.


169 posted on 07/12/2004 8:14:28 PM PDT by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: narses

Hundreds, if not thousands, of Catholics in communist-controlled countries were murdered for defending their faith and yet, year after year, they continued their steadfast opposition, demonstrating peacefully in their town squares and being gunned down and beaten to death for their efforts. Do you REALLY contend that the power of the Pope's pen brought down Communism? The Pope didn't even hold an audience with Gorbachev until 3 DAYS BEFORE THE FALL. It was not his miracle. It was the culmination of years of faithful catholic nobody's and the courage of Reagan and Gorbachev that finally nailed the coffin lid on communism and liberated Catholics to freely practice their faith.


170 posted on 07/12/2004 8:15:25 PM PDT by torqemada ("Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
It is the Rite which was guaranteed to all Roman Catholics for all futurity of time.

According to the sedevacantists, Vatican II directly contradicted previous Church doctrine.  Am I to understand that you agree with that/their position?
171 posted on 07/12/2004 8:18:10 PM PDT by GirlShortstop ( O sublime humility! That the Lord... should humble Himself like this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: torqemada

HH was one of the "catholic nobodies" for many decades in Communist Poland. I can understand your anger, but it is (imho) misplaced. Take nothing from the others, but grant HH credit where credit is due.


172 posted on 07/12/2004 8:19:10 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio; gbcdoj
GSS:  Every Catholic has a right to the sacraments (cf. Code of Canon Law, canon 843), but he does not have a right to them according to the rite of his choice.

UR:  Wrong.

Oh, I see UR, Perl is RIGHT when his words come from your SSPX bookmarked sites, but WRONG when they're not?  Glad to see your sense of humor is as good as it ever was.
173 posted on 07/12/2004 8:20:48 PM PDT by GirlShortstop ( O sublime humility! That the Lord... should humble Himself like this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: GirlShortstop

According to the sedevacantists, Traditionalists and mainstream theologians, some interpretations of V2 DO directly contradict previous Church doctrine. The very vagueness of the schemas and commentaries assure that. Further, it was a PASTORAL not DOGMATIC Council and therefore open to question by those of good faith.


174 posted on 07/12/2004 8:21:14 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: GirlShortstop

Msr. Perl's more recent words are far less critical than his earlier words. Why would you presume to be more critical than Rome?


175 posted on 07/12/2004 8:22:16 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: GirlShortstop
According to the sedevacantists, Vatican II directly contradicted previous Church doctrine. Am I to understand that you agree with that/their position?

I don't see any connection with the point I made which was that the Roman Rite was guaranteed to all Catholics in perpetuity. Nothing to do with Vatican II, at least not for those who claim that Vatican II did not intend the New Mass.

As far as your question, however, clearly Vatican II contradicted previous Church doctrine in any number of areas.

176 posted on 07/12/2004 8:22:41 PM PDT by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: narses
Msr. Perl's more recent words are far less critical than his earlier words. Why would you presume to be more critical than Rome?

Clarification, and/or cites please.
177 posted on 07/12/2004 8:24:04 PM PDT by GirlShortstop ( O sublime humility! That the Lord... should humble Himself like this...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: GirlShortstop

I am getting close to bed time. I am going to depend on others to supply the cites, but rest assured, both Rome and the SSPX have softened their rhetoric much over the last five years. The fact is that the SSPX is Catholic, Rome knows this and wants their active help in doing battle with the Modernist threat. Sadly, the French and German Bishoprics have stood firmly against either a Universal Indult or the acceptance of the SSPX into active ministry via a Personal Prelature. This scandal weakens badly the German position.


178 posted on 07/12/2004 8:29:16 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: narses

exactly.
this crisis, like the bubonic plague, has origins beyond the immediate vector. VII is sort of a Trojan Horse, supposedly a gift for a new springtime in the church, was infected with modernism which dates at least from the early 20th century. Couple modernism with infiltration by Communists and maybe others...

If VII were interpreted like its texts say, with respect for Tradition and ad orientem, who knows what would have happened.


179 posted on 07/12/2004 8:29:28 PM PDT by Piers-the-Ploughman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: GirlShortstop

See post 154, UR cited the new letter.


180 posted on 07/12/2004 8:30:13 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 501-513 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson