To: Maximilian
It is the Rite which was guaranteed to all Roman Catholics for all futurity of time.
According to the sedevacantists, Vatican II directly contradicted previous Church doctrine. Am I to understand that you agree with that/their position?
171 posted on
07/12/2004 8:18:10 PM PDT by
GirlShortstop
( O sublime humility! That the Lord... should humble Himself like this...)
To: GirlShortstop
According to the sedevacantists, Traditionalists and mainstream theologians, some interpretations of V2 DO directly contradict previous Church doctrine. The very vagueness of the schemas and commentaries assure that. Further, it was a PASTORAL not DOGMATIC Council and therefore open to question by those of good faith.
174 posted on
07/12/2004 8:21:14 PM PDT by
narses
(If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
To: GirlShortstop
According to the sedevacantists, Vatican II directly contradicted previous Church doctrine. Am I to understand that you agree with that/their position?I don't see any connection with the point I made which was that the Roman Rite was guaranteed to all Catholics in perpetuity. Nothing to do with Vatican II, at least not for those who claim that Vatican II did not intend the New Mass.
As far as your question, however, clearly Vatican II contradicted previous Church doctrine in any number of areas.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson