What did you find astounding about it? I found it to be an ordinary collection of the fallacy of the argument from ignorance, unsupported assertions, "God of the gaps", etc.
"What did you find astounding about it? I found it to be an ordinary collection of the fallacy of the argument from ignorance, unsupported assertions, "God of the gaps", etc."
First of all, the man is not a creationist and is unbiased in that regard. Secondly, his understanding of evolutionary theory is sound - you are not the only person here with a bio science background. Thirdly, he shows where it just can't be as presented by its proponents - something is missing.
"Arguments from ignorance?" Hardly, he makes the hard core evolutionists look ignorant. Probability and mathematics are much easier to test via the scientific method than evolution.