With the technology we have today, it would seem we would be more capable of re-creating such an event, at least to some small degree, such as what is claimed by many evolutionists. We could not create nuclear fusion 100 years ago, true. But we can now. Why? Because we know more, and understand more. Scientists are forever claiming to have more and better understanding of the evolutionary process, yet, we still can not provide solid scientific proof of it occurring by recreating the process or providing some solid process or processes that had to happen to make this event to start, or better yet, why we are not finding examples today of the evolutionary process continuing. This idea that evolution is happening so slow, we don't see it is absurd. We should be able to find examples of life in all kinds of stages of evolution but we don't. I just think with the technology and scientific minds we have today, we should be able, to some degree, be able to recreate this evolutionary process.
You and I could debate for months of all the things we once couldn't do, but can now do. I hope I am getting my point across here. For some reason I just feel like this statement is not getting across what I am trying to say.
I'm not sure what your point is. Are you saying anything we can't do right now isn't worth persuing? Or is it that anything we don't fully understand right now must have supernatural causes?
Scientists are forever claiming to have more and better understanding of the evolutionary process, yet, we still can not provide solid scientific proof of it occurring by recreating the process or providing some solid process or processes that had to happen to make this event to start, or better yet, why we are not finding examples today of the evolutionary process continuing.
Ever hear of ring species?