We agree on this. On Law and order they would say "Offers facts not in evidence!" The same is true when the other side says "A democrat would be better because a Republican congress would stop him". Both are guesses. Maybe good guesses, but nobody can predict the future. It's better to deal with facts. I voted for GWB in 2000 with eyes wide open, knowing he would be less conservative than me on some issues. Anybody paying attention in 2000 knew it. Heck, he was floating an immigration proposal back then. He proposed the medicare overhaul. The education bill. These were there for all to see during the campaign. I measured the factors, and decided he was still better than Gore (And I'm from TN - you're welcome!)
And he's better than anybody else that will be on the ballot this year - including Libertarian and Constitution. Anyone who campaigns on bringing the boys home to avoid "foreign entanglements" is not living in reality.