Replies

"Many of us have done that for a lonnnnnnng time, has not worked"

Take heart. This issue has been just brought to the fore with Bush's recent ravings on illegal invaders. Sing the peition on petitiononline now, and mine when I post it this weeek, and keep those e-mails and letters and phone calls up. Write in Tancredi in the Republican primary. It is bound to have some impact.

If it doesn't it is time to start another, third party. The Republicans will go the way of the Whigs and Federalists. The Democrats have already taken the path of Marx and Engels.

A political party which ignores the wishes of its constituents has no long term future, regardless of how it might it perform in the short run.

My guess is a much watered down version of Bush's prgoram will be adopted if we persist.

Bush's program is also inherently unfair and un-American as it seeks to produce a permanent class of exploited foreign laborers with minimal rights and privleges in the County in which they are expected to work. He's all wrong. His proposals are wrong and illogical. They must be opposed.

Bush's program is also inherently unfair and un-American as it seeks to produce a permanent class of exploited foreign laborers with minimal rights and privleges in the County in which they are expected to work. He's all wrong. His proposals are wrong and illogical. They must be opposed.

Percipience bump, all except the part about "illogical". Oh, they're logical, all right. Logical and perverse. The policy is to break wages in the U.S., using masses of immigrants who'll bid wages down to starvation levels. I wouldn't have believed, 20 years ago, that I would see McKinleyite policies reintroduced in this country, but that is exactly what George W. Bush is, in his domestic policy -- a clone of William McKinley. All that's missing is the gold standard, and sending National Guardsmen to break a hatmakers' strike. Unbelieveable.

A political party which ignores the wishes of its constituents has no long term future, regardless of how it might it perform in the short run. My guess is a much watered down version of Bush's prgoram will be adopted if we persist.

I know your right but Bush's intent was not noble