No, not in the least. When someone stupid acts accordingly by both (a) not addressing my points and (b) trying to label me something I'm not due to the inability to address these same points, I call them on it.
Well, when you begin to 'pull your weight' on this site MAYBE you can be entitled to an attitude like that.
Pull my weight? When you begin to construct arguments based on actual data and used both the complete historical record and rhetoric based in logic, perhaps you'll see the foolishness of your statement.
Till then reward us with silence - okay?
Sorry, if you spew BS, expect to get called on it.
While I'm here WHY do governmental organizations pass laws controlling the sale, distibution (or prohibition thereof) and/or use (limits such as blood alcohol limits) of various intoxicating substances -
a) just for the hell of it
b) to collect tax revenue
c) unfettered sale and distibution has been found to cause a problem among SOME portions of the populace (the 'stupid', those unable to regulate use of said compounds)
Careful - YOUR ANSWER may parallel mine from earlier - and we can't have that now can we ...