To: jmc813; ellery; CWOJackson
An admitted troll? Where have I admitted such?
Any trollism here would be you, and your sad, tired attempt to drag the Constitution into legitimizing illegal drugs.
141 posted on
01/05/2004 7:09:42 AM PST by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
To: AxelPaulsenJr
It must be very frustrating for them...they are so quick to lash out in their angst.
To: AxelPaulsenJr; jmc813; CWOJackson
What's the point of attacking each others' supposed motives in this discussion? It always turns into the well-worn FR WOD thread "doper-statist" insult exchange. AP, do you believe all aspects of the WOD are unquestionably Constitutional? If not, do you believe one can oppose the unConstitutional elements without promoting drug abuse?
On a separate issue, what does everyone think of this hypothesis: the desire for intoxication seems to be innate in humans -- it's found in large segments of most human societies in history. This desire can both provide benefits or it can kill you. Thoughts?
151 posted on
01/05/2004 4:01:21 PM PST by
ellery
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson