Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

?Protecting? the public from drugs
Montana Standard ^

Posted on 01/02/2004 10:07:44 AM PST by Fred Kevlin

December is the season for giving, and no one gives more generous gifts than the U.S. Congress. Of course, Congress has the advantage of doing its last-minute holiday shopping at someone else’s expense, namely yours and mine.

For example, on Dec. 8, the House of Representatives passed a bill that gives the White House drug czar’s office $145,000,000 of taxpayer money to run anti-marijuana propaganda ads. My personal favorite in this genre is a television ad in which police rough up a high school student when arresting him in the school’s marijuana-smoke-filled bathroom. This is followed by a caption reading, “Marijuana: Harmless? Think again.” (And no, I did not make that up).

Yet this bill contains something far more obnoxious than pots of money for another round of clueless anti-marijuana propaganda. A section of the bill prohibits any local transit system that receives federal funding from running privately funded ads that call for marijuana policy reform.

In other words, at the same time that the federal government is forcing you to spend your money to publicize its willingness to engage in storm trooper tactics to persecute the tens of millions Americans who smoke or have smoked marijuana, it is trying to prohibit you from having the freedom to spend your money to protest these same tactics.

If this bill becomes law, it will be illegal to buy advertising space on a city bus or in a subway station, advocating that doctors be given the right to prescribe marijuana as a painkiller for their terminally ill patients.

Two words that are thrown around far too loosely in political debate are “fascism” and “unconstitutional.” Nevertheless, this sort of thing has a distinctly fascist tinge. And if the First Amendment means anything, it ought to mean that the government cannot take away the right of citizens to engage in public political protest.

Anyone who has doubts that the drug war is wrong ought to consider what it tells us when our federal government tries to make it illegal to protest that war. Fence sitters might also want to view a the video from the surveillance tape at a Goose Creek, S.C., high school, which on Nov. 5 was raided by police looking for drugs. (A photo from the tape can be viewed at www.mpp.org).

After a search, the police found no drugs, but they did terrorize more than 100 students (two-thirds of whom were black, even though less than 25 percent of the school’s student body is black). With guns pointed at their heads, students were handcuffed and forced to lie on the floor.

One student said he assumed the police “were trying to protect us, that it was like Columbine, that somebody got in the school that was crazy or dangerous. But then a police officer pointed a gun at me. It was really scary.”

What’s really scary is that incidents such as this seem to stir so little outrage. What level of government persecution will put a dent in public apathy about the madness that is the war on drugs?

If the police at the Goose Creek high school had inadvertently shot a student or two in their zealous search for marijuana cigarettes, would that be enough to distract people from holiday shopping and channel surfing? Or would such an incident be shrugged off as another regrettable accident of the sort that is inevitable in wartime? Take a look at that photograph, and consider: This is your government on drugs.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: doubtit; leroysthread; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-187 next last
To: KEVLAR
"I simply oppose morons like you who post with no purpose other than to annoy."

Exactly bozo. It makes you wonder why that moron leroy just keeps on posting his Soror BS.

81 posted on 01/02/2004 12:20:15 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: xrp
"Taste has nothing to do with it."

There you go, under rating yourself again.

82 posted on 01/02/2004 12:20:55 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
There you go, under rating yourself again.

Nah man, I'm pretty much towards the top of the ratings scale.

83 posted on 01/02/2004 12:21:55 PM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Give him a break...his resources are drying up.
84 posted on 01/02/2004 12:21:59 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: xrp
"Nah man, I'm pretty much towards the top of the ratings scale."

Of course you are...and what was the line from the Clint Eastwood movie...?

85 posted on 01/02/2004 12:22:39 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Or maybe he has done so much ganja that he forgot where they were?
86 posted on 01/02/2004 12:23:09 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Then just buzz off, you aren't very good at annoying people either.
87 posted on 01/02/2004 12:23:16 PM PST by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Fred Kevlin
The War On Drugs has corrupted law enforcement in this country more than anything else I can think of, but the drug warriors are too busy loving people for their own good to notice.
88 posted on 01/02/2004 12:24:23 PM PST by vigilo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Things haven't been going to well for them lately. It looks like even the annual Christmas time Legalize Dope protest demonstration in Seattle didn't happen this year.

Last year was a pretty dismal affair. Only a hand full of local dopers and some anarchists from Portland standing out in the rain. My poor wife drove by them and wasn't sure what their signs said, so she drove around the block to get another look...sorry about the puddle.

This year they just abandoned the effort. Pretty bad when you can't get a pro-dope demonstration off the ground in Seattle.

89 posted on 01/02/2004 12:25:39 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
He's like a retarded kid who can only respond, "I know you are but what am I?"

I don't bother with him and his close buddies.
90 posted on 01/02/2004 12:26:03 PM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (It's not a blanket amnesty, it's amnistia del serape!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: KEVLAR
"Then just buzz off, you aren't very good at annoying people either."

I'm sorry moron...I'll try harder to live up to your example. LOL!

91 posted on 01/02/2004 12:26:26 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
It's fun to watch these threads break down into the muttering amongst themselves phase.
92 posted on 01/02/2004 12:27:54 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
"You've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya?"
93 posted on 01/02/2004 12:28:57 PM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Thank you. If I have annoyed you in any way, I will take that as a compliment and pat myself on the back for a job well done. Coming from you it means SO much more.
94 posted on 01/02/2004 12:29:46 PM PST by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: xrp
No, I was thinking, "He's a legend in his own mind."
95 posted on 01/02/2004 12:30:04 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
"You've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya?"
96 posted on 01/02/2004 12:30:22 PM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Pretty bad when you can't get a pro-dope demonstration off the ground in Seattle.

Time for some new material, Chief. You've been trotting this one around the track for some time now . . . off to the glue factory with it.

97 posted on 01/02/2004 12:31:03 PM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: KEVLAR
"Thank you. If I have annoyed you in any way, I will take that as a compliment and pat myself on the back for a job well done. Coming from you it means SO much more."

Of course, given the way the legalize dope campaign is sinking you must find your small pleasures somewhere. Glad I can assist.

98 posted on 01/02/2004 12:31:06 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
"Time for some new material, Chief. You've been trotting this one around the track for some time now . . . off to the glue factory with it."

Actually, I'd say that it's dwindling over the years to nothing would suggest that you folks need some new material...but don't start thinking smart now.

99 posted on 01/02/2004 12:32:13 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
You are truly a halfwit.
I have never advocated legalization of dope. You missed, loser. Try again.
100 posted on 01/02/2004 12:35:00 PM PST by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson