Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

?Protecting? the public from drugs
Montana Standard ^

Posted on 01/02/2004 10:07:44 AM PST by Fred Kevlin

December is the season for giving, and no one gives more generous gifts than the U.S. Congress. Of course, Congress has the advantage of doing its last-minute holiday shopping at someone else’s expense, namely yours and mine.

For example, on Dec. 8, the House of Representatives passed a bill that gives the White House drug czar’s office $145,000,000 of taxpayer money to run anti-marijuana propaganda ads. My personal favorite in this genre is a television ad in which police rough up a high school student when arresting him in the school’s marijuana-smoke-filled bathroom. This is followed by a caption reading, “Marijuana: Harmless? Think again.” (And no, I did not make that up).

Yet this bill contains something far more obnoxious than pots of money for another round of clueless anti-marijuana propaganda. A section of the bill prohibits any local transit system that receives federal funding from running privately funded ads that call for marijuana policy reform.

In other words, at the same time that the federal government is forcing you to spend your money to publicize its willingness to engage in storm trooper tactics to persecute the tens of millions Americans who smoke or have smoked marijuana, it is trying to prohibit you from having the freedom to spend your money to protest these same tactics.

If this bill becomes law, it will be illegal to buy advertising space on a city bus or in a subway station, advocating that doctors be given the right to prescribe marijuana as a painkiller for their terminally ill patients.

Two words that are thrown around far too loosely in political debate are “fascism” and “unconstitutional.” Nevertheless, this sort of thing has a distinctly fascist tinge. And if the First Amendment means anything, it ought to mean that the government cannot take away the right of citizens to engage in public political protest.

Anyone who has doubts that the drug war is wrong ought to consider what it tells us when our federal government tries to make it illegal to protest that war. Fence sitters might also want to view a the video from the surveillance tape at a Goose Creek, S.C., high school, which on Nov. 5 was raided by police looking for drugs. (A photo from the tape can be viewed at www.mpp.org).

After a search, the police found no drugs, but they did terrorize more than 100 students (two-thirds of whom were black, even though less than 25 percent of the school’s student body is black). With guns pointed at their heads, students were handcuffed and forced to lie on the floor.

One student said he assumed the police “were trying to protect us, that it was like Columbine, that somebody got in the school that was crazy or dangerous. But then a police officer pointed a gun at me. It was really scary.”

What’s really scary is that incidents such as this seem to stir so little outrage. What level of government persecution will put a dent in public apathy about the madness that is the war on drugs?

If the police at the Goose Creek high school had inadvertently shot a student or two in their zealous search for marijuana cigarettes, would that be enough to distract people from holiday shopping and channel surfing? Or would such an incident be shrugged off as another regrettable accident of the sort that is inevitable in wartime? Take a look at that photograph, and consider: This is your government on drugs.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: doubtit; leroysthread; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-187 next last
To: KEVLAR
Look around your dope thread...yep, other then a hand full of the "Just Say Yes" folks it is pretty much just me.
61 posted on 01/02/2004 12:09:49 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
You have to remember that job security is a major factor in cwojack's opinion about illegal drugs.
62 posted on 01/02/2004 12:10:44 PM PST by jedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
it took you all that time to think that up.

I went and lifted weights for an hour.

I'm so glad you're on their side.

I'm always on the side of freedom and liberty. Thanks for flying your colors:


63 posted on 01/02/2004 12:11:13 PM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: jedi
LOL!

Now we've entered into the mutter between ourselves phase of the dope thread.

64 posted on 01/02/2004 12:11:55 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Hey dude, I'm really mad at you.

You didn't ping me to the fact that LeRoy was back.

65 posted on 01/02/2004 12:12:50 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
First of all, not my thread, moron.
Second of all I am not one of "the folks" you keep referencing. Are you just a bit paranoid?
Lastly, did you read beyond the title, or is that too much work for you?
66 posted on 01/02/2004 12:13:06 PM PST by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: xrp
Lifted weights for a whole hour. I'm sure your 16oz curls were very tiring and are a good excuse for lack of creativity.
67 posted on 01/02/2004 12:13:07 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
And be accused of ganging up on them?
68 posted on 01/02/2004 12:14:16 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: KEVLAR
"First of all, not my thread, moron."

Which would explain why you're so protective of it...moron.

69 posted on 01/02/2004 12:14:46 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I'm sure your 16oz curls were very tiring and are a good excuse for lack of creativity.

No, today wasn't biceps. Today was chest and triceps. I'm sure your drinking mercury as a kid was very tasty and a good excuse for today's lack of intelligence.

70 posted on 01/02/2004 12:15:10 PM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: xrp
LOL! Someone must be sending you freep-mail. That is so much better then your usual BS.
71 posted on 01/02/2004 12:16:17 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
leroy is trying a different tact. He just posts and runs so he doesn't give himself away so quickly.

Who would ever suspect a brand new member immediately posting a "Just Say Yes" dope thread was leroy?

72 posted on 01/02/2004 12:17:43 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
leroy is trying a different tact. He just posts and runs so he doesn't give himself away so quickly.

Who would ever suspect a brand new member immediately posting a "Just Say Yes" dope thread was leroy?

73 posted on 01/02/2004 12:17:44 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I thought FRmail was broken. CinFLA never seems to respond, so I figured it was broken.
74 posted on 01/02/2004 12:17:48 PM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Protective - Do you want to borrow a dictionary?
I simply oppose morons like you who post with no purpose other than to annoy. It does not matter the subject of the thread. You have nothing to contribute and are merely disruptive. Kind of like a teenager in an AOL chat room.
75 posted on 01/02/2004 12:18:23 PM PST by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: xrp
I always suspected CinFLA had good taste.
76 posted on 01/02/2004 12:18:33 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I'm glad you love yourself.

Everyone ought to, if only to fight the anti-human propaganda of the established interests. Actually, I'm a downright arrogant SOB. ;^)

What ever are you going to do about that?

You have no effective means of combatting me - inane non sequiturs don't count.

77 posted on 01/02/2004 12:18:55 PM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: xrp
I'm sure your drinking mercury as a kid was very tasty and a good excuse for today's lack of intelligence.

His posts seem more indicative of leaden paint chips.

78 posted on 01/02/2004 12:19:31 PM PST by Pahuanui (When a foolish man hears of the Tao, he laughs out loud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I always suspected CinFLA had good taste.

Most likely it is that he is too stupid to know how to respond. Taste has nothing to do with it.

79 posted on 01/02/2004 12:19:46 PM PST by xrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
The giveaway is the source of the article. The Montana Standard. I'm really suprised he didn't make his first thread from his usual source, The Modesto Bee.
80 posted on 01/02/2004 12:19:55 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson