?Protecting? the public from drugs

Montana Standard ^

[AxelPaulsenJr]

An admitted troll? Where have I admitted such?

Any trollism here would be you, and your sad, tired attempt to drag the Constitution into legitimizing illegal drugs.

[CWOJackson]

They go there on the weight of their own merit...which I am sure is very demoralizing for you. Good.

[CWOJackson]

Seems like the owner of this forum isn't as wrapped up in this issue as a small handful of people are.

[CWOJackson]

It must be very frustrating for them...they are so quick to lash out in their angst.

[AxelPaulsenJr]

LOL, yup. JMC is just upset that his bud got detected and banned so quick.

[CWOJackson]

Oh well, I guess they are right about one thing...when they say "we" are loosing the war on drugs they are speaking for themselves.

I'be always been amazed that so many people, who swear they don't use drugs and never would, can become so consumed over a single issue. Reminds me of Churchill's Battle of Britain quote...in a bastard sort of way.

"Never have so few..."

[bvw]

I had thought I would return to being a donor to the Freepathon ... like I used to be, but jake actions like celebrating the official law-enforcement distrust of fellow adult citizens, banning a legitimate poster, and the continued diminishing of the ideals of Liberty -- condoned and encouraged by the moderators and proprieters of this forum have paused my hands.

The day YOU are banned, sir, is the day I will consider once again donating.

[CWOJackson]

Can you sing "Cry Me A River" next?

[CWOJackson]

I'd love to hang around longer but all this depression is too hard to observe. Have a nice drug free day. Later.

[AxelPaulsenJr]

Can you sing "Cry Me A River" next?

No, but I bet he can sing, I got plenty of nuthin'.

Say did you see the reference to Soros on his or her fr home page?

[ellery]

What's the point of attacking each others' supposed motives in this discussion? It always turns into the well-worn FR WOD thread "doper-statist" insult exchange. AP, do you believe all aspects of the WOD are unquestionably Constitutional? If not, do you believe one can oppose the unConstitutional elements without promoting drug abuse?

On a separate issue, what does everyone think of this hypothesis: the desire for intoxication seems to be innate in humans -- it's found in large segments of most human societies in history. This desire can both provide benefits or it can kill you. Thoughts?

[jmc813]

Is this from you jmc? About me? I thought you liked me

I do like you. You're in my top 10 "FReeper friends". However, you and the Chief have both admitted to showing up on the drug threads for your own amusement and not to contribute to the debate. That doesn't mean that y'all are both useless. Jackson is very knowledgable on military threads, and I enjoy discussing certain shows with you. I just have issues with you guys on the drug threads, that's all.

[jmc813]

...they are so quick to lash out in their angst.

I hooked up with a college chick on New Year's Eve. Angst is at an all time low for me.

[jmc813]

JMC is just upset that his bud got detected and banned so quick.

Not really. It's been how long now? 3 months? I'm over it.

[Hemingway's Ghost]

They go there on the weight of their own merit...which I am sure is very demoralizing for you. Good.

You're an excellent troll---you should be quite proud of yourself. You manage to souse up every W.o.D. thread you can find---your sole interest in this area is to see that every W.o.D. thread finds its way to the Smokey Backroom, where it's effectively killed. Every single time you show up on one of these threads, it's only a matter of time until it gets sent to the Smokey Backroom. You've obviously got the ear of an Admin Moderator or you are one yourself.

Honestly, be proud of your accomplishments. You're providing a vital cheerleading service to your party. You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about with regards to this particular issue, but nevertheless, you're providing a valuable "legbreaking" service for the GOP.

[jmc813]

You've obviously got the ear of an Admin Moderator or you are one yourself.

I can say with reasonable confidence that Jackson does not have any kind of special stroke around here. Otherwise his buddy Palpatine would be back by now.

[Hemingway's Ghost]

You may very well be right, but the pattern is there: W.o.D. thread, Jackson trolls up, thread gets Smokey Backroomed. Like clockwork.

[CWOJackson]

My sister-in-law has a little child like you...constantly whinning how life isn't fair and creating new excuses to cover up for his faults.

I'm flattered that you and your buddies think I'm so all powerful that I am the reason your threads end up here and that "you are" loosing your war on the WOD. Thanks.

[CWOJackson]

Hey, don't rain on my power trip...I'm due all the credit for these threads ending up back here. Even all those that I don't post on...I channel my objections to a mod and whoosh...back to the smokey backroom.

[Hacksaw]

Otherwise his buddy Palpatine would be back by now.

I don't think there are very many of us that were sorry to see "Palp" leave us (who knows, he may already be back).