Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

?Protecting? the public from drugs
Montana Standard ^

Posted on 01/02/2004 10:07:44 AM PST by Fred Kevlin

December is the season for giving, and no one gives more generous gifts than the U.S. Congress. Of course, Congress has the advantage of doing its last-minute holiday shopping at someone else’s expense, namely yours and mine.

For example, on Dec. 8, the House of Representatives passed a bill that gives the White House drug czar’s office $145,000,000 of taxpayer money to run anti-marijuana propaganda ads. My personal favorite in this genre is a television ad in which police rough up a high school student when arresting him in the school’s marijuana-smoke-filled bathroom. This is followed by a caption reading, “Marijuana: Harmless? Think again.” (And no, I did not make that up).

Yet this bill contains something far more obnoxious than pots of money for another round of clueless anti-marijuana propaganda. A section of the bill prohibits any local transit system that receives federal funding from running privately funded ads that call for marijuana policy reform.

In other words, at the same time that the federal government is forcing you to spend your money to publicize its willingness to engage in storm trooper tactics to persecute the tens of millions Americans who smoke or have smoked marijuana, it is trying to prohibit you from having the freedom to spend your money to protest these same tactics.

If this bill becomes law, it will be illegal to buy advertising space on a city bus or in a subway station, advocating that doctors be given the right to prescribe marijuana as a painkiller for their terminally ill patients.

Two words that are thrown around far too loosely in political debate are “fascism” and “unconstitutional.” Nevertheless, this sort of thing has a distinctly fascist tinge. And if the First Amendment means anything, it ought to mean that the government cannot take away the right of citizens to engage in public political protest.

Anyone who has doubts that the drug war is wrong ought to consider what it tells us when our federal government tries to make it illegal to protest that war. Fence sitters might also want to view a the video from the surveillance tape at a Goose Creek, S.C., high school, which on Nov. 5 was raided by police looking for drugs. (A photo from the tape can be viewed at www.mpp.org).

After a search, the police found no drugs, but they did terrorize more than 100 students (two-thirds of whom were black, even though less than 25 percent of the school’s student body is black). With guns pointed at their heads, students were handcuffed and forced to lie on the floor.

One student said he assumed the police “were trying to protect us, that it was like Columbine, that somebody got in the school that was crazy or dangerous. But then a police officer pointed a gun at me. It was really scary.”

What’s really scary is that incidents such as this seem to stir so little outrage. What level of government persecution will put a dent in public apathy about the madness that is the war on drugs?

If the police at the Goose Creek high school had inadvertently shot a student or two in their zealous search for marijuana cigarettes, would that be enough to distract people from holiday shopping and channel surfing? Or would such an incident be shrugged off as another regrettable accident of the sort that is inevitable in wartime? Take a look at that photograph, and consider: This is your government on drugs.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: doubtit; leroysthread; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-187 next last
To: CWOJackson
Only a hand full of local dopers and some anarchists from Portland standing out in the rain.

See if you can answer your own question. Are you sure you're not stoned?

101 posted on 01/02/2004 12:35:27 PM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: KEVLAR
"You are truly a halfwit."

Well, that would put me pretty much up on you there sparky.

102 posted on 01/02/2004 12:35:38 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
Doesn't look like there's a question in there...but that wouldn't be new for you.
103 posted on 01/02/2004 12:36:28 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

I just love how these threads cause so many new people to re-evaluate their positions.
104 posted on 01/02/2004 12:37:12 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I doubt that.
However, since you have posted nothing of substance, it is hard to tell.
105 posted on 01/02/2004 12:37:28 PM PST by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: KEVLAR
"...since you have posted nothing of substance..."

As only fitting for this thread that has nothing of substance.

106 posted on 01/02/2004 12:38:15 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I admit this doesn't relate to the thread, but anyway.......


107 posted on 01/02/2004 12:40:53 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I'd say that it's dwindling . . .

Only a hand full of local dopers and some anarchists from Portland standing out in the rain.

108 posted on 01/02/2004 12:41:20 PM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Do you need the article read to you?
109 posted on 01/02/2004 12:41:37 PM PST by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
There you go!

Hey, I tried telling leroy a long time ago that if he wanted his dope threads to actually attrack the average freeper he needed to change his marketing. I suggested misleading titles to sucker people in, "Cameron Diaz Protests in the Nude; pictures included" or start adding photos of scantily clad ladies.

Remember Miss Belly Button?

110 posted on 01/02/2004 12:43:45 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
"Only a hand full of local dopers and some anarchists from Portland standing out in the rain."

Yep. That was last year. They couldn't get that this year.

111 posted on 01/02/2004 12:44:40 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
This one?


112 posted on 01/02/2004 12:46:07 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Re Post #107 ... things are looking up
113 posted on 01/02/2004 12:49:23 PM PST by clamper1797 (Conservative by nature ... Republican in Spirit ... Patriot by Heart ... and Anti Liberal BY GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
More illegal drugs means more job security, right cwo? That's why I wanted your opinion on increased opium production; I bet you're for it.
114 posted on 01/02/2004 12:49:48 PM PST by jedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797; All
Anyone know the current score of the Ole Miss, OSU game?
115 posted on 01/02/2004 12:52:05 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Yes sir! Now that is what I'm talking about.

The dopers need to start using graphics like that! It won't win them many converts but at least it would make their threads appear to have some support.

Hi, I'm Belly Button Girl and nothing turns me on like a nice meth cooking freedom fighter."

116 posted on 01/02/2004 12:53:55 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Hi, I'm Belly Button Girl and nothing turns me on like a nice meth cooking freedom fighter."

LOL

117 posted on 01/02/2004 12:55:13 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
Actually, that seems to have quite a lot in common with this thread.
118 posted on 01/02/2004 12:55:34 PM PST by tacticalogic (Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr
See...it's a hit already!
119 posted on 01/02/2004 12:56:23 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
LOL, we have a winner. They have got their "Jack Booted Thugs", and we now have our, "Meth Cooking Freedom Fighters".
120 posted on 01/02/2004 12:57:05 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Excellence In Posting Since 1999)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson