"In the context of this thread" she is being attacked by a pair of classless liberals. This entices you to pile on? You bothered to respond to the question posed to you. Have you ever read Coulter's books? I have. And I've read books by your personal hero. It is meaningless to compare fiction to non fiction, but I enjoyed them both. Hemmingway was Giant of the litterary world. But if you are going to make him your personal role model, you end up looking pretty silly criticizing others for shallowness and narcissism. The man was a post child for self-absorbtion.
This thread's context is an airhead gathering called the New York Magazine Awards, an event featuring narcissistic comments and self-congratulatory backslapping from a bunch of people who have as much substance as the gap between Paris Hilton's ears. Far from piling on Ann Coulter---not that it would take more than a JV waterboy to pile on her adequately---I'm saying I could give less than a rat's ass about what any of these simpletons think.You bothered to respond to the question posed to you. Have you ever read Coulter's books? I have. And I've read books by your personal hero. It is meaningless to compare fiction to non fiction, but I enjoyed them both. Hemmingway was Giant of the litterary world. But if you are going to make him your personal role model, you end up looking pretty silly criticizing others for shallowness and narcissism. The man was a post child for self-absorbtion.I've read some of Ann's stuff. She's okay. I've read better---much, much better, in fact, and yes, I'm talking non-fiction vice fiction. If you think she's brilliant, good for you: go with it. Satisfy your inner child or whatever fantasy about Ann you might have for yourself. Personally I don't like my women to look like 13-year-old boys, but that's just me.
Your argument is based on my screen name? How brilliant.