Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: FITZ
Thanks ---- then it seems like this whole thread is a waste of time --- it clearly states everything is an opinion by the poster. We're covered.

No, it says that OPINIONS posted are not those of the management. It does not say that everything posted here is an opinion.

Opinions are not actionable, anyway. But not everything posted here is an opinion.

If I look out the window and then post, "It's night time," that's not an opinion, it's a statement of fact. It may be true or false. (In this case, it's true at the time I'm posting this).

1,359 posted on 10/24/2003 7:32:17 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1345 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
If I look out the window and then post, "It's night time," that's not an opinion, it's a statement of fact.

Not really. On the internet --- it is not night when you say it is night if I'm sitting in Australia and it's day time for me. Same with seasons. You might say it's autumn but it's spring if I'm in Australia. So that's not a fact. Again ---- what about those people who claim OJ Simpson harmed or wished to harm Nicole? He was proven innocent by the jury.

1,369 posted on 10/24/2003 7:35:35 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1359 | View Replies ]

To: Poohbah
No, it says that OPINIONS posted are not those of the management.

Scroll down to the bottom of the page and read the statement again. Nevermind, I'll post it.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management......blah, blah blah.

Granted, that statement doesn't give posters blanket immunity from libel lawsuits, but it is worded a tad stronger than the fragmented excerpt you quoted and could possibly resonate well with a jury basically sympathetic to free speech.

Schiavo might possibly be sufficiently vindictive to file a couple of harrassing lawsuits against the most vituperative FReepers if he can find a law firm willing to risk representing him on a contingency basis in such a long shot suit, but I seriously doubt anyone is in peril of losing a home or livilihood over this minor tempest in an internet teapot.

I predict with a fair amount of confidence that common sense will prevail on both sides of the controversy, and if not, on the part of the courts. This is after all only an internet political forum, and these sites are well known for almost comical outburts of temporary emotional excess which are only taken seriously by those unfamiliar with the genre. It's not like someone bought a quarter page in the NY Times to make unfounded accusations. As for my opinion of my own vulnerability to litigation, I can only say I expect to sleep the unworried sleep of a guileless infant tonight.

1,518 posted on 10/24/2003 11:14:30 PM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1359 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson