If his words are untrue, then show me where that is so.
If not, then perhaps rather than shoot the messenger, one might actually consider the message.
I know Badjoe.
He's a good man.
Is he pissed off?
Sure.
Did he lash out?
Sure.
Was he wrong?
If so... show me where.
Listen Meg, you're "new" so you really don't know Joe.
He's a good guy, on our side, & his association with Robinson was something to admire, once.
I feel nothing but emptiness over this & am particularly grieved Joe felt compelled to do what he has.
I think Joe hurts, wants to mend things, & would just like some respect.
Nobody knows what really went on between the *principles* here, except them.
It's Joe's perception he got a raw deal; &, he set the record straight just as any one of us would under like circumstance.
"Seems everyone complaining bitterly wants Jim to abdicate and turn over running FR to them."
There seems to be a power struggle of sorts but that's really not all that unusual in venues whenever intelligent, ambitious people are brought together in close quarters.
High performance always comes with high expectations.
"I saw no character shining through in the BadJoe diatribe."
You're so wrong, MEG, & that's because you don't know Joe.
Easily happens if one thinks with their emotions & not their head, y'know.
Without knowing the full picture, one only gets half the story, at best.
I can say that without the need to "serve an indictment" on either man, too.
If I'm going to wish for anything in this matter, it'll be that JR & Joe forget their few differences & renew their many commonalities, & do so for friendship's sake.
If that happened?
...getting back to the once common goal now obscured, would be child's play.