Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Militia member 'filled with rage,' plotted ambush
The Grand Rapids Press ^ | Friday, October 17, 2003 | Ed White

Posted on 10/17/2003 10:29:17 AM PDT by FourPeas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-497 next last

1 posted on 10/17/2003 10:29:17 AM PDT by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
Uh-oh! This should be an interesting thread, for sure.

I wonder if the 2nd Amendment had anti-aircraft weapons in mind?
2 posted on 10/17/2003 10:32:01 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
It had in mind anything that can be used to execute the laws, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions.
3 posted on 10/17/2003 10:36:34 AM PDT by inquest ("Where else do gun owners have to go?" - Lee Atwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
"I wonder if the 2nd Amendment had anti-aircraft weapons in mind?"

Got asbestos?

4 posted on 10/17/2003 10:37:40 AM PDT by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DaGman
""I wonder if the 2nd Amendment had anti-aircraft weapons in mind?"

Got asbestos?"

All I need.
5 posted on 10/17/2003 10:38:18 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I wonder if the 2nd Amendment had anti-aircraft weapons in mind?

Actually I would think they did since most of the cannon used in the American revolution were privately owned.

6 posted on 10/17/2003 10:40:31 AM PDT by Just another Joe (FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
"We told our kids to stay off his property."

Well, trespassing on private property is a crime in Michigan. It is always advisable to stay off private property unless you have the landowner's permission.
Michigan Trespass Law, 324.73102

"There was gunfire a lot," said Lynda Sherburne, a former township clerk who lives nearby.
So? Many people who live in rural Michigan target shoot frequently.

"Who knows where the stray bullets are going.
Typical anti-gun hysterics.
7 posted on 10/17/2003 10:41:31 AM PDT by SpellingTroll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Constitutionalist!!!! There, there, I spotted one!

All kidding aside, there are several holes in this rag's account....peppered generously with a liberal dose of fantasy.

"Federal gun and drug charges"... Oooookay, so let's hear the precise charges rather than a pretty delineation of every liberal's nightmare.
8 posted on 10/17/2003 10:42:14 AM PDT by Freemeorkillme (Keep your head down! My congressman's reloading!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
most of the cannon used in the American revolution were privately owned.

Can you source that?
(My son is quite interested in the American Revolution.)

9 posted on 10/17/2003 10:42:24 AM PDT by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan; *bang_list
"I wonder if the 2nd Amendment had anti-aircraft weapons in mind?"

A much better question would be why a government, with entires navies, air & ground forces at it's disposal, be so obsessed with keeping small arms, much less AA, out of the hands of it's citizens.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

10 posted on 10/17/2003 10:42:26 AM PDT by Joe Brower ("If you need a lawyer to tell you what your rights are, you don't have any rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Yes.
11 posted on 10/17/2003 10:43:36 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
Can you source that?

I can but it will take me a while. I don't have it readily available.

12 posted on 10/17/2003 10:44:41 AM PDT by Just another Joe (FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
"A much better question would be why a government, with entires navies, air & ground forces at it's disposal, be so obsessed with keeping small arms, much less AA, out of the hands of it's citizens."

Sorry, but this guy sounds like a serious nutcase to me. Hardly the poster boy for RKBA. Crosshairs on Bush and Rumsfeld? Sounds pretty indefensible to me.

But, if you have an argument in favor of the man, please let's hear it.

BTW, I'm not an anti-firearms guy. I own my own "arsenal."
13 posted on 10/17/2003 10:45:17 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
I'll bite - yes it certainly did contemplate privately owned weapons of this type. See Article 8 Section 11 of the Constituion which grants congresional power to "grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal". A letter of marque is used by privately owned warships, which even in the 1700's would have had devastating firepower. That settles the issue for me quite easily.

http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_of_marque
14 posted on 10/17/2003 10:45:31 AM PDT by RKV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
This guy sounds like a low level lunatic and loser. With the President and VP in his cross-hairs.

Remember, just because he's a gun owner, doesn't make him a roll model.
15 posted on 10/17/2003 10:46:03 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RKV
So, do you suppose this gentleman had been issued a "Letter of Marque" by Congress?
16 posted on 10/17/2003 10:46:21 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
there is more than enough stuff in this world to be "filled with rage" about
That is why God ..invented prunes
17 posted on 10/17/2003 10:46:50 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FourPeas
40-acre compound

What exactly is a "compound?" What makes it a "compound?"

18 posted on 10/17/2003 10:47:44 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
" wonder if the 2nd Amendment had anti-aircraft weapons in mind?"

I wonder if the 1st Amendment had your asinine comment in mind?

19 posted on 10/17/2003 10:47:47 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SpellingTroll
I thought the same things. We shot frequently on my parents' land when I was a teen. One afternoon while taking target practice my dad and I looked up to see one of our neighbor's hiking across the field in the middle of our shooting range. We'd just returned from setting up more targets and reloading. We'd been shooting for about fifteen minutes already, yet the wacko just wandered through. The wacko actually became angry when told to leave.
20 posted on 10/17/2003 10:48:01 AM PDT by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 481-497 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson