[MineralMan]

"A much better question would be why a government, with entires navies, air & ground forces at it's disposal, be so obsessed with keeping small arms, much less AA, out of the hands of it's citizens."

Sorry, but this guy sounds like a serious nutcase to me. Hardly the poster boy for RKBA. Crosshairs on Bush and Rumsfeld? Sounds pretty indefensible to me.

But, if you have an argument in favor of the man, please let's hear it.

BTW, I'm not an anti-firearms guy. I own my own "arsenal."

[B Knotts]

Do you live on a "compound?" :-)

[Just another Joe]

I would agree that this man is hardly a poster boy for RKBA but that wasn't the question you asked.

[activationproducts]

Do you think you have a constitutional right to your arsenal?

[Joe Brower]

You're changing the subject. Your initial question wasn't about how fit this particular individual is, mentally or otherwise, to exercise the RKBA. Your question was "I wonder if the 2nd Amendment had anti-aircraft weapons in mind?". It was to that query that I responded.

I agree -- this guy sounds like he's a bit off. With the "quality" of "news" reporting nowadays, though, one must wonder how much of this information is viable. If he did indeed have crosshairs drawn on GW and Rumsfield, he's no friend of mine.

Stay well,

[El Gato]

Crosshairs on Bush and Rumsfeld? Sounds pretty indefensible to me.

Comes under the first amendment, same as burning flags. Some gun ranges won't let you shoot at pictures of people, the one I belong to sells them. :) Although they do chose more appropriate objects for their "lead commnetary", like Saddam, Osama, Muamar, etc.

[philetus]

"But, if you have an argument in favor of the man, please let's hear it."

Do you have personal knowledge of this man or are you basing your opinion on the govs description of him?

When the gov gers through busting all the "wackos", no one will have guns.

[cavtrooper21]

I can only assume that you've seen this.
You sell your book to anybody in Michigan???