Yeah, I think so. Here's what I don't get....on the one side you have a druggie/drug dealing maid and her suppliers and her con man husband, a potentially criminal pharmacist, a lawyer who is a known RAT operative and the National Enquirer. On the other side you have Rush, who has an excellent reputation, has always been above baord and straightforward and quick to admit when he was wrong and as far as I know has always been truthful. Now which side does it make more sense to believe given that few facts are in?
She says Rush bought them for his Mom while she was dying...this was a couple of years ago apparently.
She invented that without reading any tin foil hat threads here.
Amazing.....and in the meantime...
I'll wait, we'll probably get the truth sooner or later.