Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Eaker
Eaker, I am not defending the princess at all....

I am questioning posters who post mean, petty and damaging (to us) crap like this thread.
107 posted on 08/17/2003 7:41:41 PM PDT by HairOfTheDog (And whither then? I cannot say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: HairOfTheDog
I think these threads are funny as Chelsea foist herself into the spotlight. I don't have a problem with them. You do. We will differ on this subject.

Peace.

109 posted on 08/17/2003 7:47:41 PM PDT by Eaker (This is OUR country; let's take it back!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

To: HairOfTheDog
I want add something to this part of the thread. I'm not taking anyone's side, but I think Chelsea brings out a lot of animosity for a number of reasons.

First, she is still being treated as "hands off," for the most part, by the press (as if she was still under 18).

Second, on more than one occasion, she has interjected herself into politics with her parents' point of view.

Third, she tried to politicize 9-11 in an article detailing her "perspective" of that day.

Fourth, from what I have read, she is every bit as nasty as her parents, in attitude.

Fifth, she is being groomed as part of a Clinton dynasty. Mark my words, she will be entering politics.

Everyone knows that I have commented on her looks in the past. I have, for the most part, tried to get away from that. However, I can understand the animosity she generates.

111 posted on 08/17/2003 7:51:14 PM PDT by Paul Atreides (Bringing you quality, non-unnecessarily-excerpted threads since 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson