Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cogitator
What I find very interesting is that in the first picture, suposedly your "baseline," from the year before, I can clearly see evidence of a recent snowfall. Note the many snow capped hills in the left portion of the picture. On the other hand, the photos for the following year clearly were taken at a time when several days or even weeks had passed without any appreciable snow fall. Are you distorting data to meet your Green Whackjob agenda?
6 posted on 07/10/2003 8:49:18 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: belmont_mark
What I find very interesting is that in the first picture, suposedly your "baseline," from the year before, I can clearly see evidence of a recent snowfall. Note the many snow capped hills in the left portion of the picture. On the other hand, the photos for the following year clearly were taken at a time when several days or even weeks had passed without any appreciable snow fall. Are you distorting data to meet your Green Whackjob agenda?

Mark, take a paranoia pill! I didn't touch the pictures, I just took them off a NASA Web site. But I doubt that a bit of snow here or there affects the way that the edge of the ice sheet is melting. If you think that these pictures have been altered for a "Green Whackjob" agenda, then you will have to express your concerns to NASA, not me.

8 posted on 07/10/2003 8:57:07 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson