Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is World's Destruction Months Away? Is NASA Keeping Mum To Prevent World Panic?
BushCountry.org ^

Posted on 05/17/2003 11:01:16 AM PDT by justme346

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 05/17/2003 11:01:16 AM PDT by justme346
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: justme346
Gosh, they've got to start pulling these wacky Planet X threads.
2 posted on 05/17/2003 11:05:47 AM PDT by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justme346
Velikovsky bump.

Pretty strange article for 'bushcountry.org', presumably a political site.
3 posted on 05/17/2003 11:06:22 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Lol... more from this "writer".
4 posted on 05/17/2003 11:06:59 AM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: justme346
Search is our friend.
5 posted on 05/17/2003 11:08:38 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justme346
Already posted HERE.
6 posted on 05/17/2003 11:09:19 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
We're done for, but before the end, I want you to know that I have always liked your space photos threads. How the Hubble missed Planet X I'll never know, but best wishes. :)
7 posted on 05/17/2003 11:10:40 AM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justme346
Brain fart.
8 posted on 05/17/2003 11:11:30 AM PDT by hauerf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justme346
" Solar Weather: McCanney says, "We're seeing the Sun at an excited level never before seen. There was a solar maximum in the year 2000 that would be the expected time for the Sun to reach the maximum of activity on its 11-year solar cycle, and after that it would be expected to diminish in energy over that 11-year span of time. We should be well on the way in the year 2003 to the solar minimum, but instead, the Sun is at an explosive state never before seen in the history of our solar system. My theoretical work shows how, in fact, the Sun is interacting with some large object that we have not seen yet -- NASA probably has seen it, but it is not telling us -- causing the dramatic solar flares that we're seeing."

Sorry, but this is simpy wrong. My wife is, among other things, an amateur astronomer and aurora watcher. There is no question that the sun is less active now than it was three years ago. Therefore this assertation is woven from whole cloth, I.E. there is nothing to it.

9 posted on 05/17/2003 11:12:20 AM PDT by Billy_bob_bob ("He who will not reason is a bigot;He who cannot is a fool;He who dares not is a slave." W. Drummond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justme346
YHWH's word is such a source. If you know the Scriptures, then you know that YHWH always takes care of his faithful people in times of trouble.

See, what basically drives garbage such as this (and I consider end-times drivel I consider the religious equivalent of porn) are people dreaming of an egotistical fantasy where they survive but, say, their much richer neighbors with a nicer house and better cars are struck down in the end times because they aren't religious enough, and then you can enjoy your schadenfreude.

Also it's a desperate hope that at SOME point people will be rewarded in the real world for being good, or religious...something that clearly doesn't happen currently (serial killers like Richard Speck happily live to ripe old ages in prison while children die of leukemia, Moore, Oklahoma, hardly a den of sin, gets hit by three tornadoes in 10 years while Baghdad, as best I can tell, hasn't had a major NATURAL disaster in quite a long time, etc.)

10 posted on 05/17/2003 11:12:34 AM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


11 posted on 05/17/2003 11:12:48 AM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Obviously, every reputable astronomer on the planet has joined NASA in this giant cover-up, along with a good many amateurs, and this has been going on for decades. It's stupid, that's S-T-U-P-I-D, to assume that only NASA and a few conspiracy theorists would know about this if were true.

For the real story on this mendacious hoax, see the Planet X FAQ at Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy.

12 posted on 05/17/2003 11:13:23 AM PDT by atomic conspiracy ( Anti-war movement: road-kill on the highway to freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: justme346

13 posted on 05/17/2003 11:15:20 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justme346
Better stock up on this:

And do what this guy is doing, just in case the Planet X comes around while you're on the road:


14 posted on 05/17/2003 11:15:46 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justme346

15 posted on 05/17/2003 11:15:49 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billy_bob_bob
Sorry, but this is simpy wrong. My wife is, among other things, an amateur astronomer and aurora watcher. There is no question that the sun is less active now than it was three years ago. Therefore this assertation is woven from whole cloth, I.E. there is nothing to it.

Yep, Solar activity has clearly declined over the last year or two, right on schedule; very easily checkable.

Never ceases to amaze me when people purporting to be Christians flat out LIE......pretty common among Creationidiots ("There are NO transitional fossils") and also among apocalyptic kookjobs...though usually they fabricate a claim about earthquakes and volcanic eruptions increasing (in reality, earthquake activity has remained remarkably steady as long as we've been able to record it accurately, and if anything has been BELOW average for several years now, and the number of LARGE volcanic eruptions has CLEARLY been well below average for a very long time...really since Pinatubo).

16 posted on 05/17/2003 11:16:22 AM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: justme346
Perhaps he could provide more. The article is too short.
17 posted on 05/17/2003 11:16:25 AM PDT by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
The WEIRDEST Visitor The Earth Has Ever Seen!

I beg to differ. That would be this fellow:


18 posted on 05/17/2003 11:16:35 AM PDT by strela (Will SIG for food)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
This article was meant to be funny, right?

5.56mm

19 posted on 05/17/2003 11:19:07 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John H K
It is not a good idea to try to fool people who have http://www.spaceweather.com in their bookmarks.
20 posted on 05/17/2003 11:20:15 AM PDT by Billy_bob_bob ("He who will not reason is a bigot;He who cannot is a fool;He who dares not is a slave." W. Drummond)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson