Skip to comments.
What constitutes a "World War"?
Myself
| 04/10/2003
| New Horizon
Posted on 04/10/2003 5:13:00 AM PDT by New Horizon
If anybody can give me an answer, it's FReepers. Are there specific prerequisites that would determine whether a war is classified as a "World War"?
Is it based on a number of countries involved, continents, or is is just a media generated thing?
Any help would be appreciated!
FReegards, NH
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
To: New Horizon
"What constitutes a "World War"? A bloody freakn mess
2
posted on
04/10/2003 5:24:43 AM PDT
by
freedom9
To: All
SHOW YOUR PRIDE! SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC!
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
04/10/2003 5:26:30 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: freedom9
LOL...you're dead on about that, but I was looking for something a little more "official".
To: New Horizon
i think that several countries/coalitions actively fighting against each other constitute a world war. that and massive military build ups, hundreds of thousands if not millions of casualties.
well, from studying WWI and WWII, that's what i think constitutes a world war
5
posted on
04/10/2003 8:13:11 AM PDT
by
swaimh
(Venimus, vidimus, vicimus: we came, we saw, we conquered [saddam, that is])
To: swaimh
The definition that I've read somewhere years ago is at least 6 countries must be involved, teritorially
To: New Horizon
Well, according to dictionary.com, it's "a war in which the major nations of the world are involved."
To: New Horizon
A World War is a war for control of a significant portion of the world. Thus the American War for Independence was a sideshow to an on-going World War in 1776. It was the French and the English fighting each other from Pittsburgh to P'yongyang. That war continues still: note the split at the UN over Iraq.
8
posted on
04/10/2003 10:24:32 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts)
To: RightWhale
To follow on to your comment, my professor in a history of modern warfare class I took at the University of Washington said that, in terms of scope of operations, World Wars I and II ought to have been renumbered 5 and 6 respectively. In addition to the contest between the French and the British that you mentioned (which was fought in episodes around the world from the 1750's to Waterloo), there were the wars surrounding the Protestant Reformation (most of the 16th century and early 17th) and the contest between the British and the Dutch in the mid to late 17th century.
9
posted on
04/10/2003 3:03:55 PM PDT
by
Captain Rhino
(- If you will just abandon logic, these things will make alot more sense to you!)
To: Captain Rhino
Bump. Thanks so far.
To: New Horizon
hey from what i have been told now im not sure if this is accurate but from what I have been told by people I have asked a war that is considered a world war involves a certain number of countries on each continent. Dont know if that is actually how a world war is defined but that is what I have heard!!!
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson